2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition

Abstract: The parahippocampal cortex (PHC) has been associated with many cognitive processes, including visuospatial processing and episodic memory. To characterize the role of PHC in cognition a framework is required that unifies these disparate processes. An overarching account was proposed, whereby the PHC is part of a network of brain regions that processes contextual associations. Contextual associations are the principal element underlying many higher-level cognitive processes, and thus are suitable for unifying t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

47
463
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 629 publications
(517 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
47
463
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The association of the Picture version with both parahippocampal regions is expected due to the visual characteristics of the test. This result is also in agreement with the evidence suggesting that both parahippocampal regions are involved in memoryrelated processing that involves associations between elements [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The association of the Picture version with both parahippocampal regions is expected due to the visual characteristics of the test. This result is also in agreement with the evidence suggesting that both parahippocampal regions are involved in memoryrelated processing that involves associations between elements [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, our finding of significant bilateral posterior parahippocampal involvement underscores the fundamental contribution of this region to the construction of scenes, potentially by coding for the presence of space (Mullally and Maguire, 2011;Zeidman et al, 2012) or the processing of contextual associations (Aminoff et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…5B, Table 5). It is thus possible that the active group benefitted from trained rIFG‐striato‐insular activation increase, while the control group benefitted from trained activation increase in posterior visual‐spatial attention regions, which are connected to lPHG [Aminoff et al, 2013], and both of which are relevant to ADHD [Hart et al, 2012, 2013; Norman et al, 2016; Rubia, 2011, 2017; Rubia et al, 2014a]. Hence, both common and group‐specific underlying processes could have accounted for their clinical improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%