1996
DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(96)00119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the nonanticipativity constraint in commercial software for stochastic project scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected project duration of a feasible solution is computed as follows: (a) a duration for each activity is drawn from the beta distribution with the parameters calculated using the three time estimates, (b) given the feasible sequence and the randomly generated activity durations, the project duration is computed, (c) the calculation of the project duration is repeated 100 times and then the average project duration for the particular feasible sequence is reported as the expected project duration. It should be noted that this approach to estimate the expected project duration violates the so-called non-anticipativity constraint (Fernandez et a!., 1996). The approach implicitly assumes that all uncertainty with regard to activity durations is resolved before the start of project execution ('anticipative'), which will only rarely be the case.…”
Section: Heuristic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The expected project duration of a feasible solution is computed as follows: (a) a duration for each activity is drawn from the beta distribution with the parameters calculated using the three time estimates, (b) given the feasible sequence and the randomly generated activity durations, the project duration is computed, (c) the calculation of the project duration is repeated 100 times and then the average project duration for the particular feasible sequence is reported as the expected project duration. It should be noted that this approach to estimate the expected project duration violates the so-called non-anticipativity constraint (Fernandez et a!., 1996). The approach implicitly assumes that all uncertainty with regard to activity durations is resolved before the start of project execution ('anticipative'), which will only rarely be the case.…”
Section: Heuristic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common objective considered in the literature is to create a policy that minimizes the expected project duration E(Cmax (IT(d») over a class of policies. Fernandez (1995), Fernandez et al (1996) and Pet-Edwards et al (1998) show how to write the corresponding optimisation problem in its general form as a multi-stage stochastic programming problem.…”
Section: Stochastic Resource-constrained Project Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common objective considered in the literature is to create a policy that minimizes the expected project duration over a class of policies (Igelmund and Radermacher 1983a, b). Fernandez (1995), Fernandez et al (1996) and Pet-Edwards et al (1998) show how to write the corresponding optimization problem in its general form as a multi-stage stochastic programming problem. A comprehensive characterization of policies can be found in Mo¨hring et al (1984Mo¨hring et al ( , 1985 and Stork (2001).…”
Section: Dynamic Scheduling Using Scheduling Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods define starting times for the activities by using scheduling policies based on a-priori knowledge, possibly based on experience from the past, about processing-time distributions [12,34,38]. Scheduling policies gradually build a schedule during the project's implementation and do not construct a complete schedule before project initiation; for this reason, these approaches are sometimes also referred to as purely reactive or on-line procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%