2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal/interrenal axis in mediating predator-avoidance trade-offs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 444 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Female corticosterone was unaffected by predation risk, but males nesting in predator boxes exhibited lower baseline corticosterone levels than males nesting in nonpredator boxes. Although this finding may at first appear incongruous with the idea that predation risk leads to physiological dysregulation (and is, in fact, in the opposite direction from our prediction), it is important to consider that a large literature on corticosterone/cortisol in animals has failed to find a consensus physiological response to chronic stress (Cyr & Romero, ; Dickens & Romero, ; Harris & Carr, ) and that sex differences in this response are common (Clinchy et al, ; Scheuerlein, Van't Hof & Gwinner, ). Although we cannot account precisely for why predator‐exposed male tree swallows exhibited lower baseline corticosterone levels than non‐predator‐exposed males, the fact that this difference exists at all suggests that adult swallows perceived and responded to our predator mounts in a manner that was distinct from the way that swallows nesting in nonpredator boxes perceived and responded to nonpredator mounts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Female corticosterone was unaffected by predation risk, but males nesting in predator boxes exhibited lower baseline corticosterone levels than males nesting in nonpredator boxes. Although this finding may at first appear incongruous with the idea that predation risk leads to physiological dysregulation (and is, in fact, in the opposite direction from our prediction), it is important to consider that a large literature on corticosterone/cortisol in animals has failed to find a consensus physiological response to chronic stress (Cyr & Romero, ; Dickens & Romero, ; Harris & Carr, ) and that sex differences in this response are common (Clinchy et al, ; Scheuerlein, Van't Hof & Gwinner, ). Although we cannot account precisely for why predator‐exposed male tree swallows exhibited lower baseline corticosterone levels than non‐predator‐exposed males, the fact that this difference exists at all suggests that adult swallows perceived and responded to our predator mounts in a manner that was distinct from the way that swallows nesting in nonpredator boxes perceived and responded to nonpredator mounts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…We also cannot rule out that the females that abandoned had higher baseline corticosterone levels. Experimentally, elevating the perceived risk of predation in breeding birds does in some cases result in an increase in circulating corticosterone (Clinchy, Zanette, Boonstra, Wingfield, & Smith, ; Sheriff, Krebs, & Boonstra, ); however, both the short‐ and long‐term effects of predators on glucocorticoids appear to be highly variable (Harris & Carr, ). Despite the high level of risk simulated by each encounter, it is possible that our protocol did not elevate perceived predation risk over longer time‐scales because of the low frequency and duration of these encounters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase perceived predation risk, a predator mount was presented to incubating females inside the nest box. This treatment was intended to mimic a short predator encounter that could induce transient changes in glucocorticoid levels or other physiological mediators, or directly influence behaviour (Harris & Carr, ; Kavaliers & Choleris, ; Lima, ). Our measure of resilience was nest abandonment during incubation (the life‐history stage during which stressors were manipulated).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, noxious stimuli may be ignored, perceived as representing a possible threatening change in the environment, or may be upgraded to a warning of actual or potential harm. If the brain perceives the noxious signal signs of an impending risk, injury or threat to survival, not only will a painful response ensue resulting in motor reflexes, but also an immune/inflammatory and hormonal response invoking the hypothalamus‐pituitary‐adrenal axis is also likely …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%