2001
DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Hippocampus in Trace Conditioning: Temporal Discontinuity or Task Difficulty?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
228
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
228
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, lesions of the visual cortex did not prevent acquisition of CRs with a light CS [73] , suggesting that the visual cortex is not involved in the process of CR acquisition, whereas stimulation of the visual cortex can be successfully used as a CS to establish CR [34] . Moreover, although lesions of the pretectal nuclei [73] and hippocampus [22][23][24]68] retarded acquisition of eyeblink conditioning, stimulation of the anterior pretectal nucleus [11] and of the CA1 layer of hippocampus [74] can not be served as effective CSs for establishing eyeblink conditioning. Therefore, the present results only suggest that electrical stimulation of mPFC is a very effective and sufficient CS for establishing eyeblink conditioning, and that it is dependent on the cerebellar interpositus nucleus, but can not be interpreted as providing evidence that mPFC is critically involved in DEC, short TEC, or long TEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, lesions of the visual cortex did not prevent acquisition of CRs with a light CS [73] , suggesting that the visual cortex is not involved in the process of CR acquisition, whereas stimulation of the visual cortex can be successfully used as a CS to establish CR [34] . Moreover, although lesions of the pretectal nuclei [73] and hippocampus [22][23][24]68] retarded acquisition of eyeblink conditioning, stimulation of the anterior pretectal nucleus [11] and of the CA1 layer of hippocampus [74] can not be served as effective CSs for establishing eyeblink conditioning. Therefore, the present results only suggest that electrical stimulation of mPFC is a very effective and sufficient CS for establishing eyeblink conditioning, and that it is dependent on the cerebellar interpositus nucleus, but can not be interpreted as providing evidence that mPFC is critically involved in DEC, short TEC, or long TEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trace eyeblink conditioning, the hippocampus is required for both acquisition (Solomon et al 1986;Moyer et al 1990;Beylin et al 2001) and retention of a recently acquired memory, but not of a remotely acquired one (Kim et al 1995;Takehara et al 2002Takehara et al , 2003a. These results suggest that the hippocampus is important for the early processes of memory (acquisition and consolidation), but the later processes (storage and retrieval) are mediated by other brain areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paradigm, the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) are separated by a stimulus-free trace interval. Previous studies using permanent lesion methods have revealed that pre-conditioning lesioning of the hippocampus (Solomon et al 1986;Moyer et al 1990;McGlinchey-Berroth et al 1997;Beylin et al 2001), the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Kronforst-Collins and Disterhoft 1998;Weible et al 2000Weible et al , 2003McLaughlin et al 2002), the entorhinal cortex (Ryou et al 2001), and the mediodorsal thalamus all impair acquisition of the trace eyeblink-conditioned response (CR), suggesting that the circuitry for this learning covers multiple regions of the brain, as others have previously proposed (Weiss and Disterhoft 1996;Green and Woodruff-Pak 2000). Furthermore, this circuitry is reorganized after the CR has been completely acquired.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, these learning tasks may not be sufficiently sensitive to the loss of newly generated hippocampal neurons. Variations on hippocampal-learning tasks, which place greater demands on the cognitive abilities of the animals, may reveal deficits (Gazzara and Altman, 1981;Beylin et al, 2001; see Winocur, this issue). This possibility is supported by data demonstrating irradiation-induced deficits in other paradigms involving spatial processing, including the Barnes maze and place recognition .…”
Section: Evidence Againstmentioning
confidence: 99%