1982
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(82)90713-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the gut flora in the reduction of sulphinpyrazone in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these metabolites were not detected in urine after oral administration. It was demonstrated in previous studies that sulphoxide drugs are metabolised to sulphides by the intestinal flora (15)(16)(17). It has been suggested that BOF-4272 is also metabolised to BOF-4269 (the sulphide metabolite of BOF-4272) by the intestinal flora in the rat, whereas little BOF-4272 is metabolised to BOF-4269 in the rat liver (12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these metabolites were not detected in urine after oral administration. It was demonstrated in previous studies that sulphoxide drugs are metabolised to sulphides by the intestinal flora (15)(16)(17). It has been suggested that BOF-4272 is also metabolised to BOF-4269 (the sulphide metabolite of BOF-4272) by the intestinal flora in the rat, whereas little BOF-4272 is metabolised to BOF-4269 in the rat liver (12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this metabolite has been reported to be up to 16 times more potent as an inhibitor of platelet cyclo-oxygenase than sulphinpyrazone it- self, the metabolite may be responsible for the main action on platelets during regular dosing (Del Maschio et al 1984;Pay et al 1980). Studies in animals (Renwick et al 1982;Strong et al 1984b) and in humans (Strong et al 1984a) have shown that the gut flora are responsible for the production of the active sulphide metabolite. Thus variations in sulphide formation would be expected to occur due to differences in the delivery of sulphinpyrazone to the hind gut, and the activity and/or numbers of sulphinpyrazone reducing bacteria in the colon and rectum (Strong et al I 984a).…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacology Group University Of Southampton Soutmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Oral doses of the drugs sulphinpyrazone and sulindac are completely absorbed and their metabolites excreted in the bile of humans (Renwick et al, 1982;Renwick et al, 1986;Strong et al, 1984b), while dimethyl sulphoxide and dimethyl sulphone are excreted in the urine as metabolites of methyl sulphide administered subcutaneously to rabbits (Williams et al, 1966). Oral doses of the drugs sulphinpyrazone and sulindac are completely absorbed and their metabolites excreted in the bile of humans (Renwick et al, 1982;Renwick et al, 1986;Strong et al, 1984b), while dimethyl sulphoxide and dimethyl sulphone are excreted in the urine as metabolites of methyl sulphide administered subcutaneously to rabbits (Williams et al, 1966).…”
Section: Iii2 Sulphides Sulphoxides/sulphones and Sulphonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro under anaerobic conditions, the sulphoxide anti-inflammatory drug sulphinpyrazone is reduced approximately six times faster in cultures with cecum contents than with liver cell homogenates from either rats (Renwick et al, 1982) or rabbits (Strong et al, 1984a). Oral doses of the sulphoxide drugs sulindac and sulphinpyrazone, which are completely absorbed and excreted in the bile of humans, are bioactivated by reduction to the corresponding monosulphides (Renwick et al, 1982;Renwick et al, 1986;Strong et al, 1984b).…”
Section: Figure Iii1 Biotransformation Of Disulphides Thiols and Rmentioning
confidence: 99%