2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the disadvantages of our methodology may be, the pattern of results that we have obtained and reported either in the body of the paper or in Appendix 1, dovetails perfectly with many of the results obtained in the literature for sentential reading, such as visuo-oculomotor effects (cf., e.g., O'Regan et al, 1994;Rayner, 1998;Vitu, McConkie, Kerr & O'Regan, 2001), effects of compound length and frequency, as well as of constituent frequencies (cf., e.g., Andrews et al, 2004;Duñabeitia, Perea & Carreiras, 2007;Hyönä & Pollatsek, 1998;Hyönä et al, 2004;Juhasz et al, 2003;Taft & Forster, 1976), and effects of orthographic n-grams (reported in Appendix 1, cf., e.g., Lima & Inhoff, 1985). Furthermore, in a recent sentential reading study (Kuperman, Bertram & Baayen, 2008), in which Finnish compounds were embedded in context, a highly similar pattern of results was observed, including early effects of compound frequency, left constituent frequency and family size, later and weaker effects of right constituent frequency and family size, interactions between morphological predictors, as well as longitudinal experimental effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the disadvantages of our methodology may be, the pattern of results that we have obtained and reported either in the body of the paper or in Appendix 1, dovetails perfectly with many of the results obtained in the literature for sentential reading, such as visuo-oculomotor effects (cf., e.g., O'Regan et al, 1994;Rayner, 1998;Vitu, McConkie, Kerr & O'Regan, 2001), effects of compound length and frequency, as well as of constituent frequencies (cf., e.g., Andrews et al, 2004;Duñabeitia, Perea & Carreiras, 2007;Hyönä & Pollatsek, 1998;Hyönä et al, 2004;Juhasz et al, 2003;Taft & Forster, 1976), and effects of orthographic n-grams (reported in Appendix 1, cf., e.g., Lima & Inhoff, 1985). Furthermore, in a recent sentential reading study (Kuperman, Bertram & Baayen, 2008), in which Finnish compounds were embedded in context, a highly similar pattern of results was observed, including early effects of compound frequency, left constituent frequency and family size, later and weaker effects of right constituent frequency and family size, interactions between morphological predictors, as well as longitudinal experimental effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have examined semantic effects in compound word decomposition by conducting a crosslanguage comparison in which compounding conventions differ between the languages (e.g., Jarema et al, 1999). This was the method used by Duñabeitia, Perea, and Carreiras (2007) with Basque and Spanish compounds. They orthogonally manipulated the frequencies of the first and second lexemes in a lexical decision task.…”
Section: Lexeme Meaning Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taft and Forster (1976) claimed that the left constituent of a compound serves as the point of access to the meaning of the compound, while Juhasz, Starr, Inhoff, and Placke (2003) argued for the primacy of the right constituent (see also Duñ abeitia, Perea, & Carreiras, 2007). Several studies of Finnish compounds established the involvement of both the left and the right constituent in reading of compounds (cf., Hyö nä & Pollatsek, 1998;Pollatsek et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%