2020
DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2020.110103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Food and Drug Administration in Drug Development: On the Subject of Proarrhythmia Risk

Abstract: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for the regulation of the pharmaceutical industry in the interest of protecting public health. The aim of this review was to outline the evolution and current role of the FDA in the development and approval of new drugs. Additionally, we describe current assessments of proarrhythmia risk to illustrate recent FDA initiatives intended to harness information technology to modernize the regulatory process. In order to identify the literature required to produce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of excellent reviews concerning proarrhythmic risk have been published whose focus was to describe the individual preclinical assays, clinical studies, and analysis schemes involved in assessing a compound's effect on ventricular repolarization. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 As the science and technology in the field of cardiac safety have evolved, so has the regulatory landscape. As such, the purpose of this review is to highlight the principal regulatory changes from the IWG publication and FDA webinar regarding the expanded role of concentration response analysis (CRA) and preclinical assays designed to evaluate the proarrhythmic potential of compounds when a substitute for a thorough QT study (TQT) study is sought or when a dedicated TQT study is not feasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of excellent reviews concerning proarrhythmic risk have been published whose focus was to describe the individual preclinical assays, clinical studies, and analysis schemes involved in assessing a compound's effect on ventricular repolarization. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 As the science and technology in the field of cardiac safety have evolved, so has the regulatory landscape. As such, the purpose of this review is to highlight the principal regulatory changes from the IWG publication and FDA webinar regarding the expanded role of concentration response analysis (CRA) and preclinical assays designed to evaluate the proarrhythmic potential of compounds when a substitute for a thorough QT study (TQT) study is sought or when a dedicated TQT study is not feasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BagA was also screened for potential cardiotoxicity by Pred-hERG, as the FDA mandates that every biomolecule undergo hERG safety testing prior to being employed as a drug candidate since blocking of the hERG protein channel has been linked to fatal cardiac arrhythmias 111 . The Pred-hERG classified BagA as non-cardiotoxic with a 60% prediction probability, as given in Table 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By initiating communication with regulatory agencies early in the development process, researchers can better understand the expectations of regulatory authorities. Researchers can also obtain guidance on study design and ensure that preclinical data align with regulatory requirements, streamlining the transition to clinical trials [ 108 ]. Researchers need to work closely with regulatory agencies to address the specific regulatory challenges associated with PLGA nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems.…”
Section: Discussion On the Challenges And Gaps In Plga Nanoparticle R...mentioning
confidence: 99%