The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in the Execution of its own Judgments: Reflections on Article 46 ECHR

Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander

doi:10.4324/9781315590738-17

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Keller and Marti (2015: 838) may currently decide to indicate general measures in any case that reveals "problems of a systemic nature in the domestic legal order". As Figure 3.A.2 shows, indications of general measures are more common than indications of individual measures (see also Sicilianos 2014). This development is significant, as it means that the ECtHR is engaged with reforms that have traditionally been thought best left to the respondent states.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Delayed but not derailed: legislative compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments

Stiansen

2019

The International Journal of Human Rights

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When embarking on this project, I was warned that writing a PhD dissertation would be a lonely process. My experience has been different. Throughout this project, I have benefited from the guidance, encouragement, and support from a long list of people. I have also been fortunate to be part of two excellent research environments at the University of Oslo, the Department of Political Science and PluriCourts. I also benefitted immensely from spending the spring of 2017 as a visiting researcher at the Department of Government at Georgetown University. First and foremost, I would like to thank my two dissertation advisors, Jon Hovi and Daniel Naurin, who have guided me through this project. Jon has been truly exceptional in his willingness to always take the time to read and offer detailed comments on any draft presented to him. Not only has his comments helped increase the clarity of the arguments presented in this dissertation, but he also deserves much credit for increasing the quality of the prose. Daniel has offered excellent advice both for sharpening the theoretical contributions and for increasing the relevance of the project to a broader judicial politics audience. Daniel also helped expand the empirical scope of the project to include the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (in addition to the European Court of Human Rights). Erik Voeten has been extraordinarily generous in offering both advice and support. The collaboration with Erik was crucial for the collection of data concerning the European Court of Human Rights. Erik has also offered thoughtful comments on the articles that make up this dissertation and hosted me during my stay as a visiting researcher at Georgetown University. I have also learned a lot from having Erik as a co-author on a paper that I have worked on as a side-project to this dissertation. I would like thank the Norwegian Research Council for support received through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project number 223274). A significant part of the work that has gone into this dissertation has involved data collection, which would not have been possible without the hard work of a small army of research assistants. I would therefore like to thank Dongpeng Xia, Ella Adler, Olja Busbaher, and Gianinna Romero who helped collect data iii concerning the implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments, and Live Standal Bøyum who helped create the database of Inter-American Court of Human Rights judgments. A number of friends and colleagues have also provided invaluable feedback on the different parts of this project. In particular, I would like to thank Taylor

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Empirical scholarship has focused on how respondent states' domestic institutions and bureaucratic capacity influence compliance. In the meantime, the ECtHR has responded in its own way by altering its remedial practice (Colandrea 2007, Leach 2013, Sicilianos 2014, Huneeus 2015, Keller and Marti 2015, Mowbray 2017, Committee of Ministers 2013.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delayed but not derailed: legislative compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments

Stiansen

2019

The International Journal of Human Rights

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in the Execution of its own Judgments: Reflections on Article 46 ECHR

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Delayed but not derailed: legislative compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments

Delayed but not derailed: legislative compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About