2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Digital Rectal Examination in Subsequent Screening Visits in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
40
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…5), and the difference between the cT1c and cT2a/b groups was statistically significant according to the log-rank test (P<0.0001). An abnormal DRE was recently reported to be associated with an increased risk of detecting high-grade (Gleason score >7) prostate cancer lesions in a screened population (31)(32)(33)(34). These descriptions are consistent with the observations obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…5), and the difference between the cT1c and cT2a/b groups was statistically significant according to the log-rank test (P<0.0001). An abnormal DRE was recently reported to be associated with an increased risk of detecting high-grade (Gleason score >7) prostate cancer lesions in a screened population (31)(32)(33)(34). These descriptions are consistent with the observations obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As prostate cancers are normally localized in the peripheral zone, DRE is very important for cancer diagnosis. As palpable masses on rectal examinations can result in high Gleason scores, they are a clear indication for prostate biopsy [7]. Of participants in the survey, 85% had seen male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and stated they prescribed alpha blockers; however, only 1 in 5 stated they performed digital rectal examinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 350 family physicians in 42 cities fully completed the survey. The mean time to complete the survey by participants was identified as 6 minutes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The mean years of experience were 12.7 years (ranging from 1-34 years).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca anormal PRM bulgusu yüksek Gleason skor ile de ilişkilidir (19,20). Çalışmamızda da PKa tespit edilen hastaların %34.1'inde anormal PRM bulgusu mevcut olup istatistiksel olarak anlamlı görüldü.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified