2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the design point for calculating failure probabilities in view of dimensionality and structural nonlinearities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25]; top, right: direction of the design point of the problem in the standard normal space [27], [36] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[25]; top, right: direction of the design point of the problem in the standard normal space [27], [36] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible selection of α could be the direction of the "design point" in the standard normal space [27], [36]. According to a geometrical interpretation, the "design point" is defined as the point * θ on the limit state surface…”
Section: Direction Of the Design Point In The Standard Normal Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition we use the modified ML-var estimator introduced in §5.2. The sequence of KL modes per level is (4,8,16,64,256, 512, 1024, 1024, . .…”
Section: Exceedence Of Outflow Through Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high dimensions this approach can be expensive since it requires the solution of an optimisation problem. Moreover, the approximation error can be considerably large [55,64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results presented by Valdebenito et al (2010) indicate that approximation methods may be inappropriate for treating high-dimensional, non-linear problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%