2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108779982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Corporate Tax

Abstract: Existing corporate taxes distort many aspects of firm behavior. To the extent that the corporate tax rate is lower than personal tax rates, taxes favor corporate activity, and favor retaining earnings rather than paying earnings out to employees and investors. Multinationals can even avoid these taxes by shifting income into tax havens. Given the ease with which multinationals can evade tax, the existing income tax structure faces major pressures, as reflected in average statutory corporate tax rates halving i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, with the enactment of expensing of most tangible capital expenditures (until the end of 2022) and the continued expensing of intangible investments, 7 the rate cut does not as substantially reduce the cost of capital; with expensing, the government is in effect a silent partner to private investment, bearing the same fraction of costs that it takes in revenue, and the extent of its partnership (that is, the tax rate) doesn't matter for the cost of capital. 8 One attempt to quantify the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on the cost of capital concluded that the 2017 law would reduce the cost of capital for equity-financed corporate (and noncorporate) investment, increase it for debt-financed investment, and decrease it overall; the estimated decrease was negligible for intellectual property (DeBacker and Kasher 2018).…”
Section: Changes In the Corporate Income Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, with the enactment of expensing of most tangible capital expenditures (until the end of 2022) and the continued expensing of intangible investments, 7 the rate cut does not as substantially reduce the cost of capital; with expensing, the government is in effect a silent partner to private investment, bearing the same fraction of costs that it takes in revenue, and the extent of its partnership (that is, the tax rate) doesn't matter for the cost of capital. 8 One attempt to quantify the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on the cost of capital concluded that the 2017 law would reduce the cost of capital for equity-financed corporate (and noncorporate) investment, increase it for debt-financed investment, and decrease it overall; the estimated decrease was negligible for intellectual property (DeBacker and Kasher 2018).…”
Section: Changes In the Corporate Income Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, after 2021 companies will not be able to write off research and development expenses immediately, but rather will be able to deduct them over a five-year period. Whether this provision will survive expected intense lobbying to overturn it is unclear 8. With a tax rate of τ, expensing of all costs and full deductibility of losses, the present value of equityfinanced investments is Σ((1 -τ)R t -(1 -τ)C t )/(1 + r) t = (1 -τ)Σ(R t -C t )/(1 + r)t .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%