The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.3989/gya.0250151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the canonical biplot method in the study of volatile compounds in cheeses of variable composition

Abstract: SUMMARY:The canonical biplot method (CB) is used to determine the discriminatory power of volatile chemical compounds in cheese. These volatile compounds were used as variables in order to differentiate among 6 groups or populations of cheeses (combinations of two seasons (winter and summer) with 3 types of cheese (cow, sheep and goat's milk). We analyzed a total of 17 volatile compounds by means of gas chromatography coupled with mass detection. The compounds included aldehydes and methyl-aldehydes, alcohols … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the canonical biplot of the variables evaluated in E. citriodora Hook plants, considering the groups of treatments. The canonical biplot is projected by the discrimination of the groups of treatments, in order to study the main variables responsible for their differentiation (González-Martín et al, 2016). The CDA approach is quite straightforward, based on the simple visual analysis of the plane with the projection of the two canonical discriminant functions (Sorbolini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the canonical biplot of the variables evaluated in E. citriodora Hook plants, considering the groups of treatments. The canonical biplot is projected by the discrimination of the groups of treatments, in order to study the main variables responsible for their differentiation (González-Martín et al, 2016). The CDA approach is quite straightforward, based on the simple visual analysis of the plane with the projection of the two canonical discriminant functions (Sorbolini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affective quantitative test: The scores given by the judges to the different attributes evaluated in the sensory panel were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a randomized-block design, and the Scott-Knott test was used for the comparison of means, adopting the 5% error-probability level (Morris,1999). A canonical correlation analysis was employed to check the inter-relationship between sensory traits and types of cheese, (Dijksterhuis, 2008;Hakan & Zubeyde, 2012;Adhikari et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2011;González-Martín et al, 2016 andKing et al, 2013). At the end of the test, the tasters were asked to express how much they agree, on a three-point scale (5 = totally agree, 2 = neither agree nor disagree, and 1 = totally disagree) with statements S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, present in the questionnaire.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the test, the tasters were asked to express how much they agree, on a three-point scale (5 = totally agree, 2 = neither agree nor disagree, and 1 = totally disagree) with statements S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, present in the questionnaire. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to check the relationship between the tasters and the answers (Dijksterhuis, 2008;Hakan & Zubeyde, 2012;Adhikari et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2011;González-Martín et al, 2016;King et al, 2013). The number of component was determined by the method of the "elbow" (fold) on the chart screen plot (Dijksterhuis, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affective quantitative test: The scores given by the judges to the different attributes evaluated in the sensory panel were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a randomized-block design, and the Scott-Knott test was used for the comparison of means, adopting the 5% error-probability level (Morris,1999). A canonical correlation analysis was employed to check the inter-relationship between sensory traits and types of cheese, (Dijksterhuis, 2008;Hakan & Zubeyde, 2012;Adhikari et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2011;González-Martín et al, 2016 andKing et al, 2013). At the end of the test, the tasters were asked to express how much they agree, on a three-point scale (5 = totally agree, 2 = neither agree nor disagree, and 1 = totally disagree)…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with statements S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, present in the questionnaire. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to check the relationship between the tasters and the answers (Dijksterhuis, 2008;Hakan & Zubeyde, 2012;Adhikari et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2011;González-Martín et al, 2016;King et al, 2013). The number of component was determined by the method of the "elbow" (fold) on the chart screen plot (Dijksterhuis, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%