2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the board and the audit committee in corporate risk management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
33
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
33
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results implicate that financial and accounting experts are more important in emerging and developing markets than in a developed market. These results are also consistent with the work of Tai et al (2018). Because financial experts are knowledgeable about bank risk, they can effectively oversee risk management issues.…”
Section: Audit Committee Structure and Bank Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results implicate that financial and accounting experts are more important in emerging and developing markets than in a developed market. These results are also consistent with the work of Tai et al (2018). Because financial experts are knowledgeable about bank risk, they can effectively oversee risk management issues.…”
Section: Audit Committee Structure and Bank Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results show that the audit committee size correlates negatively with the bank stability. This result is different to that of Tai et al (2018) and does not support the work of Baxter and Cotter (2009). Tai et al (2018) identified a negative relation between audit committee size and firm risk, but their study only focused on large firms in developed markets.…”
Section: Audit Committee Structure and Bank Stabilitycontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations