The South African Response to COVID-19 2023
DOI: 10.4324/9781003294931-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of temporary social grants in mitigating the poverty impact of COVID-19 in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceivably this lower food insecurity observed in our intra-pandemic cohort may be explained by the disproportionate insulating effect of pandemic-era government transfer payments on the income of poor, unemployed South Africans 46 , who composed the majority of both of our cohorts. Indeed, in April 2020, South Africa's government instituted both a series of existing grant top-ups in addition to a new Social Relief of Distress Grant of R350 ($21), which was offered to South Africans aged 18 and above who were already unemployed or who had lost employment due to the country's lockdown 49 Given that over 8 million economically vulnerable South Africans bene ted from this 41 billion rand ($2.4 billion USD) social assistance package 50 , it is plausible that the receipt of these grants had a particularly protective effect on our economically disadvantaged population of AYA. This increase in government support may have been complemented by both the efforts of local nongovernmental organizations, which engaged in extensive community outreach to alleviate intrapandemic food insecurity through the distribution of food and food vouchers [51][52] , and a notable increase in household agricultural production during the COVID-19 pandemic 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceivably this lower food insecurity observed in our intra-pandemic cohort may be explained by the disproportionate insulating effect of pandemic-era government transfer payments on the income of poor, unemployed South Africans 46 , who composed the majority of both of our cohorts. Indeed, in April 2020, South Africa's government instituted both a series of existing grant top-ups in addition to a new Social Relief of Distress Grant of R350 ($21), which was offered to South Africans aged 18 and above who were already unemployed or who had lost employment due to the country's lockdown 49 Given that over 8 million economically vulnerable South Africans bene ted from this 41 billion rand ($2.4 billion USD) social assistance package 50 , it is plausible that the receipt of these grants had a particularly protective effect on our economically disadvantaged population of AYA. This increase in government support may have been complemented by both the efforts of local nongovernmental organizations, which engaged in extensive community outreach to alleviate intrapandemic food insecurity through the distribution of food and food vouchers [51][52] , and a notable increase in household agricultural production during the COVID-19 pandemic 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%