2000
DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2000.11733331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of teleology in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the other apparent conflicts in Smith's corpus have been analyzed and (in many cases) resolved in the outpouring of scholarly work on Smith in the past several decades. To take just a few examples, a multitude of scholars have focused on the seeming divergence between Smith's famous account of the benefits of the division of labor with regard to productivity in Book I of The Wealth of Nations and his equally famous castigation of the debilitating effects of the division of labor on people's characters in Book V (e.g., Rosenberg 1965Rosenberg , 1995West 1996), between his frequent invocations of God and other "teleological" statements and his apparent secularism and empiricism (e.g., Kleer 1995Kleer , 2000Minowitz 1993), and between his emphasis on self-interest in The Wealth of Nations and his emphasis on sympathy in The Theory of Moral Sentiments--the key issue in the notorious "Adam Smith Problem" (e.g., Montes 2004;Otteson 2002). The apparent conflict between Smith's view of happiness as tranquility and his defense of commercial society has, however, received far less attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the other apparent conflicts in Smith's corpus have been analyzed and (in many cases) resolved in the outpouring of scholarly work on Smith in the past several decades. To take just a few examples, a multitude of scholars have focused on the seeming divergence between Smith's famous account of the benefits of the division of labor with regard to productivity in Book I of The Wealth of Nations and his equally famous castigation of the debilitating effects of the division of labor on people's characters in Book V (e.g., Rosenberg 1965Rosenberg , 1995West 1996), between his frequent invocations of God and other "teleological" statements and his apparent secularism and empiricism (e.g., Kleer 1995Kleer , 2000Minowitz 1993), and between his emphasis on self-interest in The Wealth of Nations and his emphasis on sympathy in The Theory of Moral Sentiments--the key issue in the notorious "Adam Smith Problem" (e.g., Montes 2004;Otteson 2002). The apparent conflict between Smith's view of happiness as tranquility and his defense of commercial society has, however, received far less attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase the number of books and articles has been written about it in recent decades confirms this fact (e.g. Alvey, 1994Alvey, , 1996Alvey, , 1997Alvey, , 1998aAlvey, , 1998bAlvey, , 2001Alvey, , 2003aAlvey, , 2003bClarke, 2000Clarke, , 2002Fitzgibbons, 1995;Fitzgibbons, 1995;Fleischacker, 1991Fleischacker, , 1996Fleischacker, , 2004Haakonssen, 1981;Hill, 2001;Kleer, 2000;Lux, 1990;Rothschild, 2001;Skinner, 1996;Werhane, 2006;Winch, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It isn't famous like Wealth of Nations, but proper understanding of Smith's Wealth of Nations requires a prior understanding of the Theory Moral Sentiments. Review of the lectures at the University of Glasgow of Francis Hutcheson (see Ross, 1995, p. 53), the teacher of Adam Smith and more exact study of two above books (see Kleer, 2000) shows that economics hasn't separated from ethics until (and in) smith's time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That many scholars fail to appreciate the true nature of Smith's predicament is disappointing (Leslie [1870] 1879; Kleer 1995Kleer , 2000Hill 2002;Macfie 1967;Campbell 1971;Davis 1990;cf. That many scholars fail to appreciate the true nature of Smith's predicament is disappointing (Leslie [1870] 1879; Kleer 1995Kleer , 2000Hill 2002;Macfie 1967;Campbell 1971;Davis 1990;cf.…”
Section: James Huttonmentioning
confidence: 99%