2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24672-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Synonymy and Antonymy in ’Natural’ Fuzzy Prolog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, surpass the well known assertion stating that an "Algorithm = Logic + Control" [20] and to move to a new assertion: an "Algorithm = Logic + Vague Knowledge + Control". In consonance with this argumentation, recently in a line of work proposing a 'natural' fuzzy linguistic Prolog [34], it has been suggested that a 'natural' fuzzy linguistic Prolog system should be able to work with linguistic resources (i.e. electronic linguistic tools as WordNet or ConceptNet [24]) and the resolution rule and unification mechanism should be modified in order to treat with linguistic relations (such as synonymy or antonym).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, surpass the well known assertion stating that an "Algorithm = Logic + Control" [20] and to move to a new assertion: an "Algorithm = Logic + Vague Knowledge + Control". In consonance with this argumentation, recently in a line of work proposing a 'natural' fuzzy linguistic Prolog [34], it has been suggested that a 'natural' fuzzy linguistic Prolog system should be able to work with linguistic resources (i.e. electronic linguistic tools as WordNet or ConceptNet [24]) and the resolution rule and unification mechanism should be modified in order to treat with linguistic relations (such as synonymy or antonym).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%