2016
DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v23i2.30345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of syllable intensity in between-speaker rhythmic variability

Abstract: Speech rhythm in terms of durational variability of different levels of phonetic inter vals can vary between speakers. The present article examines the role of syllabic intensity characteristics in rhythmic variability. Mean and peak intensity vari ability across syllables (stdevM, varcoM, stdevP, varcoP, rPVIm, nPVIm, rPVIp, nPVIp; henceforth: intensity measures) were investigated as a function of speaker in a database where within-speaker variability was strong (BonnTempo) and another database designed to ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Such kinematic characteristics are assumed to be the reason for speakerspecific production of prosodic duration 5,6 and intensity variabilities. 7,12 The present research underlies the assumption that the intensity contour shape might be closely related to the articulatory movements responsible for the changes of mouth opening area in an utterance. Such a view is supported by Summerfield 13 who held that the amplitude envelope co-varied with the area of mouth opening, and Chandrasekaran et al 2 who reported strong empirical evidence for Summerfield's claim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10,11 Such kinematic characteristics are assumed to be the reason for speakerspecific production of prosodic duration 5,6 and intensity variabilities. 7,12 The present research underlies the assumption that the intensity contour shape might be closely related to the articulatory movements responsible for the changes of mouth opening area in an utterance. Such a view is supported by Summerfield 13 who held that the amplitude envelope co-varied with the area of mouth opening, and Chandrasekaran et al 2 who reported strong empirical evidence for Summerfield's claim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…17 It was demonstrated to be particularly suitable for summarizing the sequential variability in speech over the course of an entire utterance. [5][6][7]17 We notated these measures as MEAN_ The intensity contour (lower plot) was calculated from the speech waveform (upper plot). The amplitude envelope (superimposed over the waveform in the upper plot) was used to facilitate locating the peak and trough points (t P and t T ).…”
Section: Measurement Of Intensity Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also provide a Praat script for this purpose, which researchers interested in cochlear implant design, speech chimera, or amplitude envelope-based approaches to speech rhythm [20,21,22,23,24,25] may find useful. Depending on the need, this script can be easily modified into a procedure to be implemented in a bigger program, or saved as a button in the Praat object window.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech rhythm is multidimensional, 1 yet the majority of rhythm models were heavily based on the durational dimension in some way. 1,2 The present study investigated the development of speech rhythm in first language (L1) from the perspective of intensity variability between syllables. Such intensity-based rhythm measures (intensity measures hereafter) may augment our understanding of the developmental patterns of L1 rhythm beyond the durational dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%