2023
DOI: 10.1177/20420188231158163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of supporting and disruptive mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis in regulating the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis

Abstract: Background: Thyroid hormones are controlled by the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) axis through a complex network of regulatory loops, involving the hormones TRH, TSH, FT4, and FT3. The relationship between TSH and FT4 is widely used for diagnosing thyroid diseases. However, mechanisms of FT3 homeostasis are not well understood. Objective: We used mathematical modelling to further examine mechanisms that exist in the HPT axis regulation for protecting circulating FT3 levels. Methods: A mathematical model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the results of a recent meta-analysis that clinical parameters are more likely to be associated with thyroid hormone levels than with TSH levels [16]. Given increasing evidence of the shortcomings of biochemical testing and particularly a TSH-centred approach, interest in clinical markers including QoL measures has resurged [17,18]. This has been aided by the development of validated and thyroid specific QoL instruments [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is in agreement with the results of a recent meta-analysis that clinical parameters are more likely to be associated with thyroid hormone levels than with TSH levels [16]. Given increasing evidence of the shortcomings of biochemical testing and particularly a TSH-centred approach, interest in clinical markers including QoL measures has resurged [17,18]. This has been aided by the development of validated and thyroid specific QoL instruments [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%