2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of subduction recycling on the selenium isotope signature of the mantle: Constraints from Mariana arc lavas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All Se isotopic compositions obtained during this study are reported relative to the NIST-3149 Se reference solution (delta-zero-anchor). Measurements of the inter-laboratory standard solution MH-495 in four different analytical sessions over a period of more than 6 months yielded an average value of δ 82/76 Se of -3.23 ± 0.15 ‰ (2 SD, N = 23, 30 ng mL −1 solutions, Table S3), in agreement with previous studies (Kurzawa et al, 2017(Kurzawa et al, , 2019Labidi et al, 2018;Yierpan et al, 2018Yierpan et al, , 2019, and our long-term reproducibility in our lab over 5 years. International rock reference material USGS BCR-2 was repeatedly digested and analyzed during the course of this study, and gave δ 82/76 Se of 0.14 ± 0.15 ‰ (2 SD, N = 4) and Se concentration of 78 ng g ˗1 , respectively (Table S4, see also König et al, 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…All Se isotopic compositions obtained during this study are reported relative to the NIST-3149 Se reference solution (delta-zero-anchor). Measurements of the inter-laboratory standard solution MH-495 in four different analytical sessions over a period of more than 6 months yielded an average value of δ 82/76 Se of -3.23 ± 0.15 ‰ (2 SD, N = 23, 30 ng mL −1 solutions, Table S3), in agreement with previous studies (Kurzawa et al, 2017(Kurzawa et al, , 2019Labidi et al, 2018;Yierpan et al, 2018Yierpan et al, , 2019, and our long-term reproducibility in our lab over 5 years. International rock reference material USGS BCR-2 was repeatedly digested and analyzed during the course of this study, and gave δ 82/76 Se of 0.14 ± 0.15 ‰ (2 SD, N = 4) and Se concentration of 78 ng g ˗1 , respectively (Table S4, see also König et al, 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…2 ) 17 . This Se isotope variability among basaltic melts might reflect additional processes 26 , emphasizing that selected peridotites, with their range of ages, may indeed represent the most robust estimate of the BSE Se isotope signature.…”
Section: Se Isotope Signature Of the Bse Inferred From Peridotitesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In other words, considering the big picture mass balance, slab dehydration may affect the mass fraction of Se without necessarily affecting its isotope signature. Preservation of the overall isotope signature of the slab, which is further subducted into the deeper mantle, is able to explain high δ 82/76 Se of plume-related lavas that trace recycled sedimentary components subducted from a redox stratified Proterozoic ocean (Yierpan et al, 2020), as well as low δ 82/76 Se of Mariana arc lavas that include recycled materials subducted from a fully oxygenated modern ocean (Kurzawa et al, 2019).…”
Section: Implications For the Se Subduction Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%