2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of sub-continental mantle as both “sink” and “source” in deep Earth volatile cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding melt generation, the conclusion based on a large number of studies analyzing extensive geochemical data sets for major CFBs, seismic imaging, plate reconstruction models, and geodynamic models is that CFB melts are derived from three potential sources: partial melting of hot mantle plume heads (e.g., Gibson, 2002; Jennings et al., 2019, and references therein; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; Mahoney, 1988; Richards et al., 1989; G. Sen & Chandrasekharam, 2011; Sobolev et al., 2011; R. White & McKenzie, 1995), melting of the overlying metasomatized lithospheric mantle material due to the plume thermal anomaly (Arndt & Christensen, 1992; Black & Gibson, 2019; Gibson et al., 2020, and references therein; Lightfoot & Hawkesworth, 1988; Lightfoot et al., 1993; J. S. Marsh, 1987; Mckenzie & Bickle, 1988; Natali et al., 2017; Turner & Hawkesworth, 1995), and other crustal‐asthenospheric melting processes (e.g., Arndt, 1989; Kempton & Harmon, 1992; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; J. S. Marsh, 1989; Sheth, 2005). Of these, the plume head model is by far the most widely accepted.…”
Section: Proposed Models For Cfb Magmatic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding melt generation, the conclusion based on a large number of studies analyzing extensive geochemical data sets for major CFBs, seismic imaging, plate reconstruction models, and geodynamic models is that CFB melts are derived from three potential sources: partial melting of hot mantle plume heads (e.g., Gibson, 2002; Jennings et al., 2019, and references therein; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; Mahoney, 1988; Richards et al., 1989; G. Sen & Chandrasekharam, 2011; Sobolev et al., 2011; R. White & McKenzie, 1995), melting of the overlying metasomatized lithospheric mantle material due to the plume thermal anomaly (Arndt & Christensen, 1992; Black & Gibson, 2019; Gibson et al., 2020, and references therein; Lightfoot & Hawkesworth, 1988; Lightfoot et al., 1993; J. S. Marsh, 1987; Mckenzie & Bickle, 1988; Natali et al., 2017; Turner & Hawkesworth, 1995), and other crustal‐asthenospheric melting processes (e.g., Arndt, 1989; Kempton & Harmon, 1992; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; J. S. Marsh, 1989; Sheth, 2005). Of these, the plume head model is by far the most widely accepted.…”
Section: Proposed Models For Cfb Magmatic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent presence of mantle composition sulphides, as well as carbonatitic and hydrous assemblages in the Seiland Igneous Province lower crustal ultramafic intrusions also support the presence of a significant volatile flux into the system throughout the CFB eruptive episode (Larsen et al., 2018). Additionally, the metasomatized mantle lithosphere may also contribute significant C to the parental melt reaching the crustal system (e.g., Black & Gibson, 2019; Gibson et al., 2020). Based on these results, we assume a higher mantle volatile composition than Black and Manga (2017) with a conservative value of 750 ppm CO 2 , and 0.23 wt % H 2 O.…”
Section: Magmatic System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aldan shield forms part of the global inventory of severely disturbed cratonic lithosphere with reduced depths to the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary relative to the intact Siberian craton interior (Aulbach, 2018 and references therein). The emplacement of volatiles in such a disturbed lithosphere mightform an important part of Earth's volatile cycles (Gibson et al , 2020). The Chompolo assemblages feature volatile-enriched minerals that are not common in pyropes derived from the inner parts of the Siberian craton (Rezvukhin et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionov et al , 2005; Khomich et al , 2015). On a global scale, our data might have implications for metal transfer and ore-forming processes in craton–margin settings affected by subduction (Holwell et al , 2019), and for the role of the continental lithosphere in Earth's volatile cycle (Gibson et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%