“…Regarding melt generation, the conclusion based on a large number of studies analyzing extensive geochemical data sets for major CFBs, seismic imaging, plate reconstruction models, and geodynamic models is that CFB melts are derived from three potential sources: partial melting of hot mantle plume heads (e.g., Gibson, 2002; Jennings et al., 2019, and references therein; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; Mahoney, 1988; Richards et al., 1989; G. Sen & Chandrasekharam, 2011; Sobolev et al., 2011; R. White & McKenzie, 1995), melting of the overlying metasomatized lithospheric mantle material due to the plume thermal anomaly (Arndt & Christensen, 1992; Black & Gibson, 2019; Gibson et al., 2020, and references therein; Lightfoot & Hawkesworth, 1988; Lightfoot et al., 1993; J. S. Marsh, 1987; Mckenzie & Bickle, 1988; Natali et al., 2017; Turner & Hawkesworth, 1995), and other crustal‐asthenospheric melting processes (e.g., Arndt, 1989; Kempton & Harmon, 1992; Lassiter & DePaolo, 1997; J. S. Marsh, 1989; Sheth, 2005). Of these, the plume head model is by far the most widely accepted.…”