2014
DOI: 10.2478/stcb-2014-0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of State in the Sphere of Innovative Development of the Agricultural Complex of Ukraine1

Abstract: The article examines the current state of innovative agricultural development in Ukraine and determines the role of the state in the sphere of innovative development of the agricultural complex. It considers the most problematic characteristics and factors of the slowdown of innovative development of domestic agricultural enterprises. It also suggests measures that would promote the increase of innovative activity of agricultural enterprises.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systemic approach today is a key in the interpretation of innovation processes, as well as the appropriate policy (Fagerberg 2015;Kasych & Vochozka 2017;Maloney 2017). The systemic nature of innovation processes is independent of the scale (Lundvall 2007) and appears at different levels of the study systems: regional (Cooke 2001;Isaksen 2001;Fedulova 2012), technological (Wieczorek & Hekkert 2012), industry-specific (Jurkovičová et al 2014), andnational (Lundvall 2007;Kasych & Vochozka 2017). Thus, the Innovation System (IS) approach underlies the formation of state innovation policies around the world (Verspagen et al 2018), in particular, Ukrainian (On Approval 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The systemic approach today is a key in the interpretation of innovation processes, as well as the appropriate policy (Fagerberg 2015;Kasych & Vochozka 2017;Maloney 2017). The systemic nature of innovation processes is independent of the scale (Lundvall 2007) and appears at different levels of the study systems: regional (Cooke 2001;Isaksen 2001;Fedulova 2012), technological (Wieczorek & Hekkert 2012), industry-specific (Jurkovičová et al 2014), andnational (Lundvall 2007;Kasych & Vochozka 2017). Thus, the Innovation System (IS) approach underlies the formation of state innovation policies around the world (Verspagen et al 2018), in particular, Ukrainian (On Approval 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elaboration of a long-term strategy for the development of the National Innovation System (NIS) and the introduction of the NIS monitoring system, compliant with the methods used by OECD countries, are seen as prerequisites for the creation of a systemic innovation policy in Ukraine (Kasych & Vochozka 2017). Pointing to the fact that there is a lack of a single structure responsible for the implementation of innovation policy in Ukraine, the dispersed functions of innovation regulation between ministries, their uncoordinated actions with the focus on the individual interests of the represented industries, and the excessive diversity and inconsistency of legislation in this area significantly hinder the country's innovation development (Jurkovičová et al 2014;Yegorov & Ranga 2014). Scientists, however, do not pay enough attention to the roots of these problems, nor ways to solve them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%