1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112098003589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of ‘splashing’ in the collapse of a laser-generated cavity near a rigid boundary

Abstract: Vapour cavities in liquid flows have long been associated with cavitation damage to nearby solid surfaces and it is thought that the final stage of collapse, when a highspeed liquid jet threads the cavity, plays a vital role in this process. The present study investigates this aspect of the motion of laser-generated cavities in a quiescent liquid when the distance (or stand-off) of the point of inception from a rigid boundary is between 0.8 and 1.2 times the maximum radius of the cavity. Numerical simulations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
86
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(52 reference statements)
12
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, multibubble applications always have to deal with the interaction of bubbles with boundaries, be they hard (as in materials science) or soft (as in biological and medical contexts). With the experimental observation and numerical simulation of jet cavitation in bubble collapses near a wall by Lauterborn (1988a, 1988b), Vogel et al (1989), Tomita and Shima (1990), Blake et al (1997), Philipp and Lauterborn (1997), Lauterborn and Ohl (1998), Blake et al (1998Blake et al ( , 1999, Tong et al (1999), Brujan et al (2001aBrujan et al ( , 2001b, research in this complex area has only just begun.…”
Section: E Multibubble Fields: In Search Of a Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, multibubble applications always have to deal with the interaction of bubbles with boundaries, be they hard (as in materials science) or soft (as in biological and medical contexts). With the experimental observation and numerical simulation of jet cavitation in bubble collapses near a wall by Lauterborn (1988a, 1988b), Vogel et al (1989), Tomita and Shima (1990), Blake et al (1997), Philipp and Lauterborn (1997), Lauterborn and Ohl (1998), Blake et al (1998Blake et al ( , 1999, Tong et al (1999), Brujan et al (2001aBrujan et al ( , 2001b, research in this complex area has only just begun.…”
Section: E Multibubble Fields: In Search Of a Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of a bubble with its environment generically establishes an asymmetry that, for strong interaction, leads to jet formation, whereby the bubble pierces itself with a high-speed liquid jet. In the case of a bubble collapsing in a stationary liquid near a solid boundary, the jet is directed towards the boundary and reaches velocities of the order of 100 m s −1 (Benjamin & Ellis 1966;Plesset & Chapman 1971;Lauterborn & Bolle 1975;Blake, Taib & Doherty 1986;Tomita & Shima 1986;Blake & Gibson 1987;Vogel, Lauterborn & Timm 1989;Zhang, Duncan & Chahine 1993;Shaw et al 1996;Tong et al 1999;Brujan et al 2002;Popinet & Zaleski 2002;Lindau & Lauterborn 2003;Johnsen & Colonius 2009;Ochiai et al 2011). Jet formation is also observed with bubbles compressed by a shock wave (Bowden 1966;Dear, Field & Walton 1988;Bourne & Field 1992Antkowiak et al 2007;Hawker & Ventikos 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The maximum pressure recorded varies from nearly 7 GPa for ζ = 1.0625 to a mere 0.5 GPa for ζ = 2.125. It would be a likely candidate to assess for the generation of at least surface damage on a nearby surface, although full assessment of all possible contributions to damage is beyond the scope of this article (Philipp & Lauterborn 1998;Tong et al 1999;Eisenmenger 2001;Zhong et al 2001;Zhu et al 2002;Birkin et al 2005a;Calvisi et al 2007Calvisi et al , 2008Klaseboer et al 2007;Sapozhnikov et al 2007;Iloreta et al 2008;Lauterborn & Kurz 2010;Vian et al 2010).…”
Section: Lithotripter Shock-bubble Interaction Near a Rigid Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between these and damage is made through empirical observation of patients (Leighton et al 2008c), and there is no intention here of linking the calculated pressure and flow fields to damage. The search for such a direct linkage is subject to an ongoing and intensive international research effort (Philipp & Lauterborn 1998;Tong et al 1999;Eisenmenger 2001;Zhong, Zhou & Zhu 2001;Zhu et al 2002;Birkin et al 2005a;Calvisi et al 2007;Klaseboer et al 2007;Sapozhnikov et al 2007;Calvisi, Iloreta & Szeri 2008;Iloreta, Fung & Szeri 2008;Lauterborn & Kurz 2010). To be clinically relevant, the output of such research would require challenging extrapolation to clinical tissue from the materials used in laboratory experiments or simulations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation