2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of spectral resolution and classifier complexity in the analysis of hyperspectral images of forest areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM is a complex distribution-free classifier, based on a robust theoretical framework [45]. Its use was adopted in this study due to the high classification accuracy it has demonstrated in many remote sensing applications the past few years [46] and, particularly, in the classification of hyperspectral data [47][48][49]. We actually used a modified version of the original SVM, which is capable of producing a continuous output (that is, a fuzzy degree in the range [0,1] for each class), along with the crisp classification decision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM is a complex distribution-free classifier, based on a robust theoretical framework [45]. Its use was adopted in this study due to the high classification accuracy it has demonstrated in many remote sensing applications the past few years [46] and, particularly, in the classification of hyperspectral data [47][48][49]. We actually used a modified version of the original SVM, which is capable of producing a continuous output (that is, a fuzzy degree in the range [0,1] for each class), along with the crisp classification decision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it has been necessary to select a subset of data in order to decrease the dimensionality of the dataset and reduce redundant information. Therefore, the selection of the subsets can be carried out by taking into account the sensitivity of the vegetation variables to the spectral bands [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of machine learning methods has therefore regarded as efficient and robust protocols for predicting forest biophysical traits in the field of remote sensing [40][41][42]. Particularly, these methods, which make no assumption on the out response variables distribution, have increasingly offered a better capability to analyze remotely sensed data [43,44]. In particular, there is a lack of knowledge on whether high resolution multispectral data (e.g., WV-2) could be employed for predicting LAI of individual tree species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%