1969
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.64.2.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of some statistical and mathematical methods in the interpretation of regional geochemical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend‐surface analysis is a popular technique to separate the spatial patterns into two factors: a regional trend and residual values (Agterberg, ; Davis & Sampson, ; Unwin, ). The regional trend, regarded as the geological background, is computed by the polynomial surfaces of successive powers; while the residual values, corresponding to geological anomalies, are the arithmetic differences between the original data and the regional trend, indicating local variations (Nichol et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend‐surface analysis is a popular technique to separate the spatial patterns into two factors: a regional trend and residual values (Agterberg, ; Davis & Sampson, ; Unwin, ). The regional trend, regarded as the geological background, is computed by the polynomial surfaces of successive powers; while the residual values, corresponding to geological anomalies, are the arithmetic differences between the original data and the regional trend, indicating local variations (Nichol et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trend map delineates the general distribution of an element, and the local variations are emphasized after the removal of systematic variations (Nichol et al, 1969). The trend surface function gives (Oliveira, 1979):…”
Section: Trend Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of its most useful applications occurs where only a few linear combinations are found to represent many variables and where these linear combinations, or factors, can be interpreted in terms of geological processes (e.g., Klovan, 1968b;Nicol et al, 1969). Even if interpretations are somewhat ambiguous, useful empirical correlations can arise in some cases (e.g., Wilson and Sinclair, 1969).…”
Section: Q-mode Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%