2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of socio-demographic factors and physical functioning in the intra- and interpersonal variability of older adults’ sedentary time: an observational two-country study

Abstract: Background Insight into the variability of older adults’ sedentary time is needed to inform future interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the intra- and interpersonal variability in sedentary time, and the moderating role of socio-demographics, physical functioning and geographical location in this variability. Methods Cross-sectional data from 818 community-dwelling older adults (mean age: 74.8 years; 61.1%women) of the Active Lifesty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study, which indicate that sedentary times increase with age, are consistent with those of most previous studies [12,[25][26][27]. Conversely, a study conducted in the United Kingdom reported no association between age and sedentary behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of this study, which indicate that sedentary times increase with age, are consistent with those of most previous studies [12,[25][26][27]. Conversely, a study conducted in the United Kingdom reported no association between age and sedentary behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An association between sedentary behavior and comorbidities or inflammatory markers has also been reported in individuals with diabetes mellitus [10,11]. Although several studies have reported a wide range of factors associated with sedentary behavior in the general population [12][13][14], to the best of our knowledge, similar studies in individuals with diabetes mellitus are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%