2018
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of social proximity in professional CEO appointments: Evidence from caste/religion‐based hiring of CEOs in India

Abstract: Research Summary: The role of homophily in CEO appointments at the largest corporations is an important subject in corporate governance. This subject is particularly important in a country like India where a multitude of religions, castes, and communities form its social fabric. We test for the role of homophily in professional CEO appointments in India by empirically examining the preference for same caste/religion CEOs by the largest firms. Using a unique dataset, assembled by detailed identification of cast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although management literature has examined gendered inequalities (Acker, 1990;McCarthy, Soundararajan, & Taylor, 2020;Pullen & Rhodes, 2015), racial inequalities (Al Ariss, Özbilgin, Tatli, & April, 2014;Johnson, 2009;Nkomo, 1992), and more recently caste inequalities (Bapuji & Chrispal, 2020;Chen, Chittoor, & Vissa, 2015;Damaraju & Makhija, 2018) within organizations, we observe that mainstream management research on intersectional inequalities is scattered. Theoretically speaking, the invisibilization of intersectional inequalities hasn't been understood enough, and little work has tried to explain the complex relationship between the visible and invisible aspects of intersectional inequalities within organizations, where different forms of inequalities interact to produce layers of vulnerability and precarity among employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although management literature has examined gendered inequalities (Acker, 1990;McCarthy, Soundararajan, & Taylor, 2020;Pullen & Rhodes, 2015), racial inequalities (Al Ariss, Özbilgin, Tatli, & April, 2014;Johnson, 2009;Nkomo, 1992), and more recently caste inequalities (Bapuji & Chrispal, 2020;Chen, Chittoor, & Vissa, 2015;Damaraju & Makhija, 2018) within organizations, we observe that mainstream management research on intersectional inequalities is scattered. Theoretically speaking, the invisibilization of intersectional inequalities hasn't been understood enough, and little work has tried to explain the complex relationship between the visible and invisible aspects of intersectional inequalities within organizations, where different forms of inequalities interact to produce layers of vulnerability and precarity among employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Both the CEM procedure and IV estimation used in our analyses are capable of handling survivorship bias and have been applied in prior literature to this issue (Greene, 2017: 245). However, as a further robustness check, we followed the literature to minimize survivorship bias by only keeping recent service adopters (following Damaraju and Makhija, 2018) or financially strong firms at low risk of bankruptcy (following Lafontaine et al., 2019). The results remained unchanged (§EC10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we ran each incoming CEO's family name through a computer program, NamePrism, that identifies the geographic origin of the name (Ye et al, 2017; Ye & Skiena, 2019). Recent examples of other research that uses family names to identify ethnicity include the following: Damaraju and Makhija (2018), Lamare (2016), Clark et al (2015), and Peterson et al (2011). The NamePrism program yields Asian, Hispanic, and “Other” (mostly Middle Eastern) groups of CEOs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%