2021
DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review

Abstract: Rising political polarization is, in part, attributed to the fragmentation of news media and the spread of misinformation on social media. Previous reviews have yet to assess the full breadth of research on media and polarization. We systematically examine 94 articles (121 studies) that assess the role of (social) media in shaping political polarization. Using quantitative and qualitative approaches, we find an increase in research over the past 10 years and consistently find that pro-attitudinal media exacerb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(88 reference statements)
2
106
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…At the level of institutions, the structures of public institutions (e.g., government [1] and social and mass media [61][62][63][64][65]) may amplify stereotypes, making each side seem like a caricature of itself by incentivizing provocative and outrageous rhetoric. These institutions are the platforms for public dialogue, and norms tilt towards hostility.…”
Section: What Causes Partisan Animosity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of institutions, the structures of public institutions (e.g., government [1] and social and mass media [61][62][63][64][65]) may amplify stereotypes, making each side seem like a caricature of itself by incentivizing provocative and outrageous rhetoric. These institutions are the platforms for public dialogue, and norms tilt towards hostility.…”
Section: What Causes Partisan Animosity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of institutions, the structures of public institutions (e.g., government [1] and social and mass media [61][62][63][64][65]) may amplify stereotypes, making each side seem like a caricature of itself by incentivizing provocative and outrageous rhetoric. These institutions are the platforms for public dialogue, and norms tilt towards hostility.…”
Section: What Causes Partisan Animosity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further studies show that instead of promoting such democratic participation, in the digital sphere people strengthen their prior points of view (Ausserhofer and Maireder 2013) as they see the contents of those who they choose to follow, due to algorithmically recommended content, which also tends to be in line with their views and opinions as they are based on search history and users' past activity (Finn 2017;Mayer-Schönberger and Cukier 2013;Terren and Borge 2021). This has led authors to speak about the internet as a space that deepens filter bubbles (Pariser 2011) and political polarization (Kubin and von Sikorski 2021;Terren and Borge 2021). The platforms can mimic the capitalist dynamic of stratified attention, amplifying the messages of those who hold power (Casero-Ripollés 2021; Dubois and Gaffney 2014;Fuchs 2017), and previous studies show that the main recipients of politicians messages on social media are either politicians or the media, homophily being one of the reasons why they have been conceptualized as echo chambers of the elites (Bruns and Highfield 2013;Colleoni et al 2014).…”
Section: Introduction 1echo Chambers or Enhanced Public Sphere?mentioning
confidence: 99%