The role of social institutions in the operation of Maribor start-ups and cooperatives after economic crisis in 2008

Abstract

The economic crisis in 2008 stimulated two distinct types of economies in the post-industrial city of Maribor: start-ups and cooperatives. They were both introduced and promoted as alternatives to the industrial or service economy. In the article, I compare them to understand the features that influenced their success, continuity, and their mark on young people and society in general. The ethnographic work was devoted to the relationship between the company/ cooperative employee and his/her family, kinship and age, socialisation, the role and meaning of local social and natural environments, perceptions of work, gender relations, missions and company products, legal conditions, the content of initial business training, the types and influences of supportive institutions, the acquisition of basic funds, leisure ideas and practices, the importance of digital technologies and databases, and the share of both business spheres in the formation of urban subcultures. The article also shows the importance of focal place, education and titles, recruitment and training (incubators), business skills, funds, language, growth, and the global movement of capital for the advancement of young entrepreneurs on both sides of the conceptual comparison. The author suggests that academic economics is the most important pillar of neoliberal ideology in Maribor and in shaping national legislation, policies, and funds. It is additionally important with its support to IT start-ups at the Venture Factory (University of Maribor). The crisis encouraged the state to support cooperatives from 2014 to 2018 with sociologists, philosophers, and anthropologists in the background. Later, when crisis was over, the state and municipality withdrew, and the community of cooperatives almost disappeared.This paper is open access and may be further distributed in accordance with the provisions of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 HR licence.

Deindustrializacija in prihodnost: Izkušnje časa po stečaju tovarne Mura

“…V raziskavi sem obravnavala generacijo ljudi, 29 ki je zaradi neaktivnosti 30 v družbi obveljala kot obsojena in izgubljena. Prevladujoča vizija prihodnosti je bila in ostaja utemeljena na mlajši podjetniški generaciji (Kozorog, 2021;Simonič, 2021). Zaradi vsega naštetega se zavzemam, da o prihodnosti razmišljajmo tudi v povezavi z deindustrializacijo in ne izhajamo zgolj iz postindustrijske paradigme razvoja, ki zakriva razlastitev in družbene neenakosti.…”

“…In my research, I focused on the generation of people who were considered doomed and lost because of their inactivity (the term was transferred from the administrative categories of the labor market to everyday life). The overall vision of the future in Slovenia is based on the younger entrepreneurs (Kozorog, 2021;Simonič, 2021). Therefore, I urge to include deindustrialization in the studies of the future and not to assume only (uncritically) the postindustrial paradigm; this paradigm hides industrial) labor dispossession and social inequalities.…”

Neenaki institucionalni pogoji delovanja mariborskih zagonskih podjetij in zadrug po gospodarski krizi leta 2008

“…Besedilo je bilo v deloma drugačni obliki že objavljeno v angleščini v znanstveni reviji Studia Ethnologica Croatica (Simonič 2021). Zahvaljujem se uredništvu za dovoljenje za objavo prevoda.…”

Pojmovanje podjetništva mladih v diskurzih politike Evropske unije

“…2 Več o mladih slovenskih podjetnikih kot nastajajočih družbenih akterjih in o razvoju podjetništva v negotovem sodobnem času glej Kozorog 2018Kozorog , 2019Kozorog , 2021Petrović-Šteger 2018Petrović-Šteger , 2021Vodopivec 2018;Poljak Istenič 2021;Simonič 2021.…”