2007
DOI: 10.3200/socp.147.2.137-158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Social Class in the Formation of Identity: A Study of Public and Elite Private College Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the United States, the widespread ''myth of meritocracy'' encourages the notion that citizens have equal access to material resources, education, occupational choice, and prestige based on individual effort and hard work. This fits well within the framework of democracy but falls short of being accurate in capitalist societies where social and cultural capital determines access to economic capital and overall social class status (Aries & Seider, 2007). In reality, social class is largely inherited and shared laterally based on social location including race, ethnicity, immigration status, family-of-origin, community connections, wealth, and other related variables (Stephens, Markus, & Townsend, 2007).…”
Section: Social Classsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the United States, the widespread ''myth of meritocracy'' encourages the notion that citizens have equal access to material resources, education, occupational choice, and prestige based on individual effort and hard work. This fits well within the framework of democracy but falls short of being accurate in capitalist societies where social and cultural capital determines access to economic capital and overall social class status (Aries & Seider, 2007). In reality, social class is largely inherited and shared laterally based on social location including race, ethnicity, immigration status, family-of-origin, community connections, wealth, and other related variables (Stephens, Markus, & Townsend, 2007).…”
Section: Social Classsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, nonaffluent students disidentify with affluent campuses' upper-class norms of individual success (Stephens et al 2012). Finally, on an affluent campus, affluent students were found to have higher occupational aspirations, and to be more aware of the personal benefits of affluence, than lower-class students (Aries and Seider 2007). Affluent campuses may thus prompt conservative economic views primarily among affluent students.…”
Section: How Affluent Campuses Activate Affluent Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative studies carried out in the USA, using both national data (Walpole, 2003) and institutional data (Berger & Milem, 1999) found social class differences in academic and social integration which ultimately resulted in different levels of institutional commitment. More recently, qualitative studies in the USA indicate that social class has an impact on levels of integration and the extent to which students feel that they ‘fit in’ (Aries & Seider, 2005, 2007). Similarly, Thomas and Quinn (2007) in their study of non‐traditional students in the UK found they were relatively unprepared for the university experience and lacked a sense of entitlement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%