2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds

Abstract: Both social and ecological factors influence population process and structure, with resultant consequences for phenotypic selection on individuals. Understanding the scale and relative contribution of these two factors is thus a central aim in evolutionary ecology. In this study, we develop a framework using null models to identify the social and spatial patterns that contribute to phenotypic structure in a wild population of songbirds. We used automated technologies to track 1053 individuals that formed 73 73… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extend this evidence to a wild population, and demonstrate that the link between sociality and scrounging is robust to fission-fusion dynamics [28], suggesting that stable groups are not necessary for this pattern to occur. Finally, our results suggest that a correlation between sociality and scrounging in fission-fusion populations can still be achieved with tactic-specialized individuals as long as individuals differ consistently in their level of sociability (previously demonstrated in this population [46]), highlighting how interacting individuals can experience different social environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We extend this evidence to a wild population, and demonstrate that the link between sociality and scrounging is robust to fission-fusion dynamics [28], suggesting that stable groups are not necessary for this pattern to occur. Finally, our results suggest that a correlation between sociality and scrounging in fission-fusion populations can still be achieved with tactic-specialized individuals as long as individuals differ consistently in their level of sociability (previously demonstrated in this population [46]), highlighting how interacting individuals can experience different social environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Social interactions such as these are a kind of predator-predator interaction—and an important one—that we had not considered a priori. Such aggregations are also quite common in a variety of other systems: flocks of birds gathering around successfully foraging conspecifics at experimental feeders (Aplin et al 2015; Farine et al 2015 a ), Komodo dragons cuing in on the volatile blood scent of recently bitten buffalo (Walpole 2001), bats recruiting to each other’s feeding buzzes (Gillam 2007), and so on. Such tendencies to aggregate often override aspects of interference competition that would otherwise prevent grouping behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is interesting to consider how social structure might have additionally influenced this process in the wild population. Great tits show a fission-fusion social structure, with extensive mixing and remixing of small foraging flocks (38,39) and with social information moving between individuals via these foraging associations (18,40). It seems likely that this social system might have acted to increase the rate at which the population could flexibly adjust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immigrants could be classed only as first year or older on plumage; however, as most individuals disperse as relatively young individuals, in all analyses they were assigned as their youngest possible age based on first capture date. From autumn to winter, birds form loose flocks of unrelated individuals (38,39) with groups aggregating to exploit patchy food sources. In spring and summer, great tits prefer insect prey, but switch to a seed-based diet in winter when insects are less available [e.g., beech mast, Fagus sylvatica (40)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%