The Role of Similarity Cues in the Development of Trustin Sources of Information About GM Food

Abstract

In evaluating complex new technologies, people are usually dependent on information provided by others, for example, experts or journalists, and have to determine whether they can trust these information sources. This article focuses on similarity as the basis for trust. The first experiment (N = 261) confirmed that a journalist writing about genetically modified (GM) food was trusted more when his attitude was congruent with that of his readers. In addition, the experiment showed that this effect was mediated by the perceived similarity of the journalist. The second experiment (N = 172) revealed that trust in a journalist writing about the focal domain of GM food was even influenced by him expressing a congruent attitude in an unrelated domain. This result supports a general similarity account of the congruence effect on trust, as opposed to a confirmatory bias account.

RETRACTED: Increasing interpersonal trust through divergent thinking

“…Transferred money would be multiplied by three, after which the trustee could reciprocate by giving part of this tripled amount back to the trustor. Thus, by transferring eurocents to the trustee, the trustor could gain extra endowments, but only if the trustee would give enough money back—which makes the amount transferred by the trustor an indicator of interpersonal trust (Meijnders et al, 2009). …”

Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust

“…Trust levels vary between different representatives of the food system as well as sources of information (Meijnders et al 2009). Outcomes of an Australian investigation into trust in actors of the food chain show that although trust in politicians was low, moderate trust was placed by consumers in media and supermarkets (Henderson et al 2011).…”

Social trust and risk perception of genetically modified food in urban areas of China: the role of salient value similarity

“…Specifically, social trust pertains to the expectations toward actors (e.g. the scientists, the companies, and the regulators) but not to the products (Meijnders et al 2009). Earle and Cvetkovich (1995) clarified the concept of social trust, which refers to the willingness of an individual to rely on specialists and organizations that manage the risks or use the technologies.…”