2011
DOI: 10.1108/00483481111169652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of silence on employees' attitudes “the day after” a merger

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to explore the role of organizational silence and trust on employees' attitudes in a post‐merger stage.Design/methodology/approachThe results of two independent studies are presented; participants completed measures of organizational trust, organizational silence and merger attitudes (organizational commitment and employee satisfaction) a few months following the announcement of the merger. Hierarchical regression analyzes were used to explore the hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
26
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the number of previous studies on employee silence (Huang et al, 2005;Knoll & van Dick, 2012;Nikolaou, Vakola, & Bourantas, 2011;Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2008;Vakola & Bouradas, 2005;Wang & Hsieh, 2013), there has been a lack of knowledge available regarding the associations among power distance, collectivism, punishment, and a multidimensional construct of silence (acquiescent, defensive, and prosocial silence). Therefore, in this study our aim was to fill this gap in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the number of previous studies on employee silence (Huang et al, 2005;Knoll & van Dick, 2012;Nikolaou, Vakola, & Bourantas, 2011;Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2008;Vakola & Bouradas, 2005;Wang & Hsieh, 2013), there has been a lack of knowledge available regarding the associations among power distance, collectivism, punishment, and a multidimensional construct of silence (acquiescent, defensive, and prosocial silence). Therefore, in this study our aim was to fill this gap in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Managers believe that employees encourage themselves to speak clearly but they apply formal methods to cope up with opposite views of employees. Indeed, organizational silence components, Top management attitudes to silence, Supervisor's attitudes to silence, Communication opportunities and Employees silence behavior explain the condition of this organizational phenomenon among the employees (Vakola & Bouradas, 2011). Organizational silence is associated with limitation of effectiveness of or organizational decision making and change processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such era, for survival, organizations need the people reacting well for environmental challenges and don't fear of sharing knowledge and information and attempt for their own beliefs and the beliefs of their teams. Although these items emphasize on empowerment and open communication channels, most of employees report that their organizations don't support communication, knowledge and information sharing and these items are the reasons of failure of change management plans (Vakola & Bouradas, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trust has substantial impact on information sharing and exchange (Creed & Miles, 1996 (Creed & Miles, 1996). If employees trust the organization, they share their concerns without hesitation (Nikalaou, Vakola, & Bourantas, 2011). In addition, trust in organization will affect self-efficacy and confident of employees (Yang & Mossholder, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Organizational Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%