2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of shale content and pore-water saturation on frictional properties of simulated carbonate faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1995) show for two aftershocks sequences on a natural fault, the increase in stress drops with recurrence interval can be explained by laboratory‐measured frictional healing rates. Healing rates are material dependent, and laboratory experiments show that calcite‐rich material exhibits larger frictional healing rates than clay‐rich materials under the conditions of our tests (Carpenter et al., 2016; Ruggieri et al., 2021). Because we also observe that stress drop of our laboratory SSEs increases with increasing recurrence interval (Figure 7d), which can be linked to partial locking and inter‐SSE healing, large frictional healing rates may explain why the SSEs occur preferentially in the calcite‐rich materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1995) show for two aftershocks sequences on a natural fault, the increase in stress drops with recurrence interval can be explained by laboratory‐measured frictional healing rates. Healing rates are material dependent, and laboratory experiments show that calcite‐rich material exhibits larger frictional healing rates than clay‐rich materials under the conditions of our tests (Carpenter et al., 2016; Ruggieri et al., 2021). Because we also observe that stress drop of our laboratory SSEs increases with increasing recurrence interval (Figure 7d), which can be linked to partial locking and inter‐SSE healing, large frictional healing rates may explain why the SSEs occur preferentially in the calcite‐rich materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This is consistent with previous studies, which show that calcite-rich lithologies are stronger than phyllosilicate-rich materials. For example, Ruggieri et al (2021) show that the friction coefficient decreases from 0.65 to 0.37 as a function of increasing shale content in shale-limestone powder mixtures, at normal stresses of 30-100 MPa. The friction coefficient we measure for the chalk, which consists of 99% calcite, has values ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 for 10 μm/s and 1.7 nm/s at in-situ (7.1 MPa) and 10 MPa effective normal stress.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Static friction as low as 0.3-0.2 can be found only in clay-rich rocks (e.g., phyllosilicates). However, friction experiments on carbonates-clay mixtures show that the increase of clay content promotes a clear transition from velocity weakening to velocity strengthening behavior (Ruggieri et al, 2021). In consideration of these experimental values, the models of Family (B) may be plausible when considering rocks rich in phyllosilicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such low static friction values retrieved for Family (B) are located in and around the nucleation zone. Since these conditions may lead to velocity strengthening, this area would be less prone to nucleate (Ruggieri et al, 2021). Finding clay-rich rocks at depths similar to the hypocentral depth is unlikely (Porreca et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%