1997
DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199701000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Sexual Partnership Networks in the Epidemiology of Gonorrhea

Abstract: Measures accumulated over times similar to the duration of infection are more informative than are static cross sections. The patterns of sexual mixing and network structure influence patterns of infection. In particular, the establishment of infection is most sensitive to the proportion of nonmonogamous pairs, the component distribution and cohesion among those with high activity. The subsequent prevalence is most sensitive to the assortativeness of mixing in the high-activity class and a measure of cohesion,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
158
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, exact relationship timing was not taken into account, based on evidence that short-term cumulative network measures are more relevant for disease transmission than instantaneous measures. 16 We used a sexual network position categorization that we have validated as a marker of STI infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea in a previous analysis of the Bayview network data. 17 Based on those results, participants were divided into three groups of increasing STI risk.…”
Section: Network Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, exact relationship timing was not taken into account, based on evidence that short-term cumulative network measures are more relevant for disease transmission than instantaneous measures. 16 We used a sexual network position categorization that we have validated as a marker of STI infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea in a previous analysis of the Bayview network data. 17 Based on those results, participants were divided into three groups of increasing STI risk.…”
Section: Network Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is not necessarily the case that these patterns can be easily expressed in tractable mathematics. Refined models based on typical social patterns such as partnership formation and dissolution [22,23], sexual network formations [24], or concurrent partnership [25] have been analyzed by various authors (see also [26,27,28]), and more recently in the context of HIV/AIDS transmission [29,30]. However such models are susceptible to unreliable data since sexual intercourses are difficult to track through statistical surveys or marital status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile it is always good to emphasize the importance of studying personal networks due to the relative ease of carrying out these studies, making possible responses to scientific questions about the their epidemiological impact on STD/HIV. An example of this is an article published by Ghani et al 16 , in which the authors demonstrate that the risk of a person acquiring an infection is determined by the structure of his/her personal network.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Stdmentioning
confidence: 99%