The Role of Second Order Schemas in the Construction of Complex Words

Booij, Geert; Masini, Francesca

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14102-2_4

Cited by 27 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another candidate for sister schemas, also involving particle verbs, is their relation to their nominalizations, as in (17) (see Booij and Masini, 2015 for parallels in Dutch).…”

Section: Sister Schemas In Phrasal Syntaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(12) and (13) illustrate sister relations between words . The story gets more interesting when we consider what Booij (2010) and Booij and Masini (2015) call second-order schemas and what we call sister schemas : pairs of systematically related patterns, as in (14). Each individual pair is connected by a shared base.…”

Section: “Bound Roots” Sisters and Sister Schemasmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar

Jackendoff

Audring

2020

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relational morphology (RM) is a novel approach to word structure that bears a close relation to construction grammar (CxG). Based on the parallel architecture framework, its basic question is: what linguistic entities are stored in long-term memory, and in what form? Like CxG, RM situates the "rules of grammar" in an extended lexicon, right along with words, multiword expressions such as idioms and collocations, and meaningful syntactic constructions. However, its notion of schema enriches CxG's notion of construction in a number of respects, including (a) the possibility of purely formal schemas that lack meaning, (b) a more precise way of specifying relations among lexical items than standard inheritance, (c) the possibility of "horizontal" relations between individual words and between schemas, (d) a clearer characterization of the distinction between productive and nonproductive phenomena, and (e) more explicit integration with theories of language processing and of other domains of cognition.

show abstract

“…Another candidate for sister schemas, also involving particle verbs, is their relation to their nominalizations, as in (17) (see Booij and Masini, 2015 for parallels in Dutch).…”

Section: Sister Schemas In Phrasal Syntaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: “Bound Roots” Sisters and Sister Schemasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar

Jackendoff

Audring

2020

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, parasynthetic derivatives (Tab.1-b,c) (Hathout and Namer 2018), are said to be "over-marked" because one of their formal parts does not play a role in the construction of their meaning. Finally, the derivational relations obtained by affix replacement (Booij and Masini 2015) are both "under-and over-marked" with respect to each other: in Tab.1-d, Lex 2 is constructed by replacing -ism in Lex 1 by -ist (and vice versa). Non-canonical derivations also include processes that regularly produce two series of words with the same shape but different meanings, or with distinct forms but the same meaning.…”

Section: Morphemes and Form-meaning Non-compositionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

ParaDis and Démonette – From Theory to Resources for Derivational Paradigms

Namer¹,

Hathout²

2020

PBML

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article traces the genesis of the French derivational database Démonette v2 and shows how current architecture and content of derivational morphology resources result from theoretical developments in derivational morphology and from the users' need. The development of this large-scale resource began a year ago and is part of the Demonext project (ANR-17-CE23-0005). Its conception is adapted from theoretical approaches of derivational morphology where lexemes, units of analysis, are grouped into families that are organized into paradigms. More precisely, Démonette v2 is basically an implementation of ParaDis, a paradigmatic model for representing morphologically complex lexical units, formed by regular processes or presenting discrepancies between form and meaning. The article focuses on the principles of morphological, structural and semantic encoding that reflect the methodological choices that have been made in Démonette v2 . Our proposal will be illustrated with various examples of non-canonical word formations.

show abstract

“…In their cross-linguistic accounts of phrasal nouns, Booij (2010), Masini/ Benigni (2012), Booij/Masini (2015), Booij/Audring (2015) formulate phrasal schemas which act both as redundancy statements, which are able to analyse the internal structure of conventionalised multi-word units, and as templates for forming novel multi-word expressions. Similar schemas, postulated for Polish phrasal nouns below, show that phrasal lexemes have the properties of both lexical and syntactic items.…”

Section: The Treatment Of Phrasal Nouns In Construction Morphologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Compounds and multi-word expressions in Polish

2019

Complex Lexical Units

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this chapter is to discuss multi-word units in Polish, focusing on complex nominals (so-called juxtapositions), and to consider their interaction with compounds proper. 1 Multi-word expressions (MWEs) are defined by Sprenger (2003: 4), Masini (2009: 245) and Hüning/Schlücker (2015: 450) as combinations of two or more words which are used as names for specific concepts. MWEs are intermediate between syntactic units and word-formation units. They show phrase-like syntactic complexity yet they resemble morphologically complex words (such as affixal derivatives and compounds) in exhibiting the naming function. Consequently, some scholars (e. g. Masini 2009; Booij 2010; Masini/Benigni 2012) refer to MWEs as "phrasal lexemes". The layout of this chapter is as follows. A short overview of MWEs in Polish is given in the remainder of this section. Section 2 mentions basic types of Polish compounds proper and illustrates the occurrence of so-called "solid compounds". Section 3 offers a brief description of phrasal nouns (referred to as "juxtapositions" by Polish linguists). Section 4 discusses some criteria used in distinguishing between compounds proper, solid compounds and juxtapositions. The criteria in question involve prosodic pattern, orthographic form and inflectional properties of compounds. Section 5 examines syntactic fixedness and the internal complexity of juxtapositions. In Section 6 the issue of competition and complementariness between compounds proper and juxtapositions is explored. Section 7 demonstrates that a felicitous account of the interaction between morphological compounds and phrasal lexemes can be offered within the framework of Construction Morphology (as developed by Masini 2009; Booij 2010; Masini/Benigni 2012, among many others). A summary of conclusions is given in Section 8.

show abstract

The Role of Second Order Schemas in the Construction of Complex Words

Cited by 27 publications

References 13 publications

Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar

Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar

ParaDis and Démonette – From Theory to Resources for Derivational Paradigms

Compounds and multi-word expressions in Polish

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About