2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3112761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of reverse time migration in imaging and model estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the velocity model is precise, the reversed-time wave field should converge and be enhanced at the origins of the to-be-imaged structures. Previous studies [19], [27], [28] have compared back-projection method and RTM by using complex velocity structure models, and have confirmed better results by using RTM. However, with the advantage of RTM outlined previously, the barriers to RTM adoption are also evident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the velocity model is precise, the reversed-time wave field should converge and be enhanced at the origins of the to-be-imaged structures. Previous studies [19], [27], [28] have compared back-projection method and RTM by using complex velocity structure models, and have confirmed better results by using RTM. However, with the advantage of RTM outlined previously, the barriers to RTM adoption are also evident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Compared with back-projection, by applying full wave equation, RTM is capable of involving all wave field phenomenon including diffraction, aberration and multiple scattering. However it requires much higher usage of CPU time and memory [27].…”
Section: Back-projection and Reverse Time Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reverse time migration is extrapolated to image based on the two-way wave equation and, compared with other migration algorithms, it can deal with steeply dipping subsurface structure and strong lateral velocity variations and retain the wave vector characteristics. However, large computational cost and high memory requirements are the limitations of its application (Li et al, 2009;Farmer et al, 2009). …”
Section: Reverse-time Migrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The search for more reliable seismic images and additional subsurface information, such as fracture distribution, drives advances in seismic acquisition, such as larger offsets, wider azimuths, and multicomponent recording. All of these advances facilitate incorporating anisotropy and elasticity into wavefield extrapolation and reverse time migration (RTM), which is the state-of-art wavefield imaging algorithm suitable for complex geologic structures (Baysal et al, 1983;Lailly, 1983;McMechan, 1983;Levin, 1984;Chang and McMechan, 1987;Hokstad et al, 1998;Farmer et al, 2009;Zhang and Sun, 2009). Although seismic acquisition improves with such advances, it always involves practical limitations, such as finite and irregular data sampling, which negatively impact wavefield im-aging methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%