2009
DOI: 10.1080/09537280903209378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of resource configuration on mix flexibility requirements

Abstract: Uncertainty and variety have been established as the fundamental reasons for needing manufacturing flexibility at a plant level. However, the sole focus on uncertainty and variety often leads to the neglect of factors that influence flexibility requirements at the system and resource levels. To address this neglect, this article considers the role of manufacturing resource configuration in influencing the need for mix flexibility. This article begins by revisiting literature that reviews the plant level driver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This greater flexibility provided a strong competitive advantage to Japanese firms (De Meyer et al 1989) that explains the subsequent adoption of the lean production model by many European and North American companies. This success lead researchers and practitioners to identify manufacturing flexibility as the focus of the next competitive battle (De Meyer et al 1989) and explains the growing interest of managers in the search of greater manufacturing flexibility in their firms and the subsequent relevance conceded by academics to the study of manufacturing flexibility (Wilson and Platts 2009). 1 Despite the great amount of effort devoted to the study of manufacturing flexibility, the field is far from exhausted.…”
Section: Manufacturing Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This greater flexibility provided a strong competitive advantage to Japanese firms (De Meyer et al 1989) that explains the subsequent adoption of the lean production model by many European and North American companies. This success lead researchers and practitioners to identify manufacturing flexibility as the focus of the next competitive battle (De Meyer et al 1989) and explains the growing interest of managers in the search of greater manufacturing flexibility in their firms and the subsequent relevance conceded by academics to the study of manufacturing flexibility (Wilson and Platts 2009). 1 Despite the great amount of effort devoted to the study of manufacturing flexibility, the field is far from exhausted.…”
Section: Manufacturing Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product wheel concept used as a lean tool in the process industry provides a means through which the sequencing coordination mechanism used to manage shared resources in the achievement of mix flexibility can be realized. The product wheel concept takes into account the three main factors which Wilson and Platts (2009) argue impact mix flexibility: product variety; uncertainty and resource configuration. Both product variety and uncertainty are considered in the determination of the average product demand and demand variability, when the products are classified as MTS or MTO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our interest is in the short term, operational flexibility, which refers to flexibility achieved during day-to-day operations, where both the plant and equipment, and the routines and procedures used to guide operations are fixed (Carlsson, 1989). Wilson and Platts (2009) argued that the amount of mix flexibility required influences how mix flexibility is achieved. Uncertainty and variety are traditionally viewed as the fundamental reasons for needing manufacturing flexibility at a plant level (Gerwin, 1987).…”
Section: Flexibility and Resource Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there appears to be consensus on the need for enhanced flexibility, there is less clarity or agreement on how this might be achieved at the manufacturing level through the right configuration (Wilson and Platts 2009). Among the different configuration levers, Upton (1995Upton ( , 1997 states that "The flexibility of plants depended much more on people than on any technical factor" (Upton 1995, p. 75).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%