2021
DOI: 10.3390/socsci10090317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Resilience in Reducing Burnout: A Study with Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: Although burnout is a widely studied topic, there is still much to learn about this symptom during a pandemic crisis like the one caused by COVID-19. Moreover, and according to the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory, the relation between personal resources and burnout is still an understudied topic. The main goal of this research is to understand the influence of mental resilience on the three dimensions of burnout-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal achievement-among healthcare workers when … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them were doctors and nurses. According to Orrù et al ( 2021 ), the majority of healthcare workers die as a result of the psychological stress, including uncertainty about disease progression (short- and long-term effects), treatment, lack of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), physical exhaustion, excessive workload, and concerns about direct COVID-19 exposure in the workplace (Britt et al, 2021 ; Ferreira and Gomes, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of them were doctors and nurses. According to Orrù et al ( 2021 ), the majority of healthcare workers die as a result of the psychological stress, including uncertainty about disease progression (short- and long-term effects), treatment, lack of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), physical exhaustion, excessive workload, and concerns about direct COVID-19 exposure in the workplace (Britt et al, 2021 ; Ferreira and Gomes, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. and long-term effects), treatment, lack of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), physical exhaustion, excessive workload, and concerns about direct COVID-19 exposure in the workplace (Britt et al, 2021;Ferreira and Gomes, 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-resilience group presented lower scores (median (IQR)) on the SF-36, compared with the high-resilience group: physical functioning (80 vs. 90 ), role-physical (50 vs. 75 ), bodily pain (51 vs. 62 ), general health (60 vs. 72 ), vitality (35 [20-45] vs. 50 ), role-emotional (33 [0-66] vs. 100 [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100]), and mental health (44 [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] vs. 66 [0-100]), p < 0.001. There was no difference in social functioning between the low-and high-resilience groups (50 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] vs. 50 [37][38][39][40][41]…”
Section: Sf-36 and Shs For Groups Categorized In Terms Of Resilience ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows that participants working with COVID-19 patients had lower scores (median (IQR)) on the SF-36, compared with those who do not work with COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001): physical functioning (85 vs. 95 [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100]), role-physical (50 vs. 100 ), bodily pain (51 vs. 84 ), general health (67 vs. 80 , vitality (40 vs. 65 ), role-emotional (33 [0-100] vs. 100 [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100]), and mental health (52 vs. 82 ). There was no difference in social functioning between the COVID and NO COVID groups (50 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] vs. 50 [37][38][39][40][...…”
Section: Sf-36 and Shs For Groups Categorized In Terms Of Resilience ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation