2003
DOI: 10.1097/00011363-200307000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Readability in Todayʼs Classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Un certain contrôle portant sur différents critères a été exercé afin de fournir des textes ni trop complexes, ni trop faciles aux élèves de chaque degré. Ces critères étaient inspirés d'écrits sur le sujet (Fisher, Frey & Lapp, 2012;Gunning, 2003;Mesnager, 2002). Le vocabulaire des textes était ainsi contrôlé afin de présenter un défi surmontable lors de la lecture.…”
Section: Les éPreuves De Compréhensionunclassified
“…Un certain contrôle portant sur différents critères a été exercé afin de fournir des textes ni trop complexes, ni trop faciles aux élèves de chaque degré. Ces critères étaient inspirés d'écrits sur le sujet (Fisher, Frey & Lapp, 2012;Gunning, 2003;Mesnager, 2002). Le vocabulaire des textes était ainsi contrôlé afin de présenter un défi surmontable lors de la lecture.…”
Section: Les éPreuves De Compréhensionunclassified
“…When determining the difficulty level of written material, researchers and textbook publishers take an approach that is quantitative, qualitative, or a combination of both. The quantitative approaches traditionally reduce the level of text difficulty to a single metric on the basis of one or more measures of sentence complexity and vocabulary difficulty (e.g., Fry, 2002;Gunning, 2003;Peterson, 1991). More recent readability systems (e.g., Source Rater, Reading Maturity, Co-Metrix) include additional measures, such as text coherence (for a discussion, see Nelson, Perfetti, Liben, & Liben, 2012).…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Text Complexity Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The judgment method is the most commonly used method to estimate the difficulty level of reading materials adopted by ESL instructors. However, while ESL instructors are consistent in ranking the difficulty of reading materials, in corresponding to objective measures of difficulty, their ranking could be inaccurate and inadequate (Chall, 1958;Gunning, 2003). Besides that, this method is unreliable if it is done by untrained instructors (Klare, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%