2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

Abstract: The proto-oncogene RAS, coding for a 21 kDa protein (p21), is mutated in 20% of lung cancer. However, the literature remains controversial on its prognostic significance for survival in lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of the literature with metaanalysis to assess its possible prognostic value on survival. Published studies on lung cancer assessing prognostic value of RAS mutation or p21 overexpression on survival were identified by an electronic search. After a methodological assessment, we estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
363
1
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 532 publications
(385 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
8
363
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregating data obtained by univariate analysis in retrospective trials, ras gene alteration appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC (Mascaux et al, 2005). The authors concluded that ras appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of survival in NSCLC globally, in adenocarcinomas and when it is studied by polymerase chain reaction.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aggregating data obtained by univariate analysis in retrospective trials, ras gene alteration appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC (Mascaux et al, 2005). The authors concluded that ras appears to be a pejorative prognostic factor in terms of survival in NSCLC globally, in adenocarcinomas and when it is studied by polymerase chain reaction.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The proto-oncogene ras is mutated in 20% of lung cancer (Mascaux et al, 2005). Among 36 patients with primary operable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we detected seven (19.4%) with K-ras exon I mutations on tumour samples (Ferretti et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The participation of many readers was a guarantee for the correct interpretation of the articles. The methodological evaluation was scored according to the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) scale previously published (Steels et al, 2001) and applied in other meta-analyses (Delmotte et al, 2002;Meert et al, 2002aMeert et al, , b, 2003Martin et al, 2003Martin et al, , 2004Mascaux et al, 2005a). Each item was assessed using an ordinal scale (possible values: 2, 1, 0).…”
Section: Methodological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to clarify the prognostic impact of other biological factors in lung cancer, our group has performed systematic reviews of the literature with meta-analyses. It allowed us to show that VEGF (Delmotte et al, 2002), microvessel density (Meert et al, 2002b), EGFR (Meert et al, 2002a), HER-2/Neu , Ki-67 (Martin et al, 2004), K-Ras (Mascaux et al, 2005a) and p53 (Steels et al, 2001) have a negative impact on survival, whereas Bcl-2 is associated with a favourable survival effect, at least when studying their impact in univariate analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, KRAS mutations have been reported in 15-20% of all patients with NSCLC and approximately in 30-50% of patients with adenocarcinoma histology [32].…”
Section: Krasmentioning
confidence: 99%