2019
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 16 ] However, although previous studies tried to increase the response rate by sending reminders and the giving of modest incentives, they did not achieve 70%. [ 17 18 19 ] We tried to avoid low response, which can introduce bias into results, by sending five reminders to participants. [ 20 ] The reasons for nonresponders and the lack of participation were not investigated as that was beyond the scope of this study and could have breached confidentiality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 ] However, although previous studies tried to increase the response rate by sending reminders and the giving of modest incentives, they did not achieve 70%. [ 17 18 19 ] We tried to avoid low response, which can introduce bias into results, by sending five reminders to participants. [ 20 ] The reasons for nonresponders and the lack of participation were not investigated as that was beyond the scope of this study and could have breached confidentiality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitutes were matched based on age, sex and geographical location, in substitution phases. In order to increase the response rate, we sent a reminder for participants who did not respond within ten days as recommended by several studies 25 , 26 . Out of 1,512 invited, 543 participants responded to the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalizability of the present study is further limited by biases that may have been introduced by our sampling method: sending out email invitations, advertising our study in person at local support groups (this accrued the smallest return), and advertising it on social media. A number of studies have documented that women are generally more likely than men to engage with online surveys [82][83][84], and our disproportionate ratio of females to males would seem consistent with this observation, despite its incongruence with the elevated ratio of males to females diagnosed with autism [85,86]. Notably, studies concerning mental health in non-autistic people have linked the lower up-take by men to the greater stigma that men experience around discussing and seeking help for mental ill-health [87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Studymentioning
confidence: 99%