The Role of Public Participation in Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from China

Abstract

As an essential stakeholder of environmental resources, the public has become the third force which assists in promoting environmental governance, together with local governments and polluting enterprises. In this paper, we construct a mediation model and a 2SLS (Two Stage Least Square) model to illustrate the role of public participation based on inter-provincial panel data of China from 2011 to 2015. The results indicate that the advantages of handling informational asymmetry and enhancing social supervision are the two logical starting points of involving public participation in environmental governance. As the public has no executive power, they can participate in environmental governance in an indirect way by lobbying local governments' environmental enforcement of polluting enterprises. In addition, their deterrent of polluting enterprises can also generate effects similar to local governments' environmental enforcement, and such a deterrent will help promote environmental governance directly. At the present time in China, the effects of public participation in environmental governance are mainly reflected in the form of back-end governance, while the effects of front-end governance are not remarkable enough. This research is of great significance in perfecting China's environmental governance system by means of arousing and expanding the public's rights to participate in environmental governance.

The Complexity of Space Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

“…The steps required include the following: (1) The support of laws and regulations on air pollution control by referring to, to name some, ambient air quality standard regulations according to WHO standards, regulations on the use of vehicle fuel, regulations on motor vehicle emission testing, and regulations to reduce air pollution emissions from industry; (2) better cross-sectoral coordination with academics and professional organizations to address air pollution problems across all sectors, using studies to determine the sources of air pollution in urban areas (emissions inventory) and to assess the health impact of air pollution on communities and efforts; (3) taking steps to reduce air pollution such as promoting and implementing emission tests for motor vehicles entering the Urip Sumoharjo-Perintis Kemerdekaan road corridor, especially public vehicles or freight vehicles, and monitoring air pollution emissions and administering strict punishments to industries that are not environmentally friendly; (4) promoting alternative power plants, such as wind power, wave power, and solar power, to reduce air pollution emissions from power plants; (5) supporting mass transportation facilities that are safe, comfortable, inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and easily accessible; (6) preparing parking lots adjacent to public transportation facilities that are feasible, safe, affordable, and able to accommodate needs for transportation for economic activities and other social activities; (7) campaigning for the use of electric vehicles (cars and electric motorbikes) and increasing the number of public vehicles with electric power; (8) increased tree planting and green areas; (9) maximizing air pollution monitoring and early warnings in the community by increasing the number of monitoring points/measuring instruments for air quality and by providing information that is easily accessible to the public; (10) regularly providing information to the public about unhealthy air quality conditions and the anticipatory steps that can be taken by the public in various media (print, electronic, and social media); and (11) preparing a health service system to serve people affected by air pollution. Although no firm evidence of an association between air pollution and overall mental health has been found, the results show significant evidence of a positive relationship between air pollution and depression [121,122].…”

The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on Environmental Governance Satisfaction

“…Greenstone and Hanna pointed out that strong public support can make environmental regulations successful, even in weak institutional settings [35]. The effectiveness of the public participation process and results will significantly improve their satisfaction with environmental governance and the government's environmental governance effect [36]. Jae-hyuck Lee et al studied the environmental impact assessment of residents in the process of public participation [37].…”

A Sustainable Revolution: Let’s Go Sustainable to Get Our Globe Cleaner

“…In order to promote more environmentally sound systems, Guo and Bai [21] suggest that the public has an important role in environmental governance to promote changes. They model the potential effects of public participation and identify that the public can have an influence on the important environmental enforcement of polluting enterprises, extending empirical research to promote public involvement in environmental governance.…”