The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities

Abstract

There is a gradual but clear transition towards a circular economy (CE) that will potentially have significant impacts on ports, both in their function as transport nodes and as locations for logistics and manufacturing activities. A rough appraisal of new investments in circular manufacturing activities in ports in Europe drawn from organizational reports and official webpages illustrates the (slow) development of circular activities in ports. This paper is to our knowledge the first paper which deals with the implications of CE for the business model of the port development company. We assess if and how the circularity transition affects the role and business model of port authorities as developers of port clusters. We outline a framework for analyzing the consequences of CE on the business model of the port authority. We then apply this framework to get a detailed understanding of the emerging CE ecosystem in the Port of Amsterdam, which is clearly a frontrunner in the transition, and the role of the government-owned Port of Amsterdam port development company (PoA) in developing this ecosystem. In Amsterdam, a CE ‘business ecosystem’ has emerged and continues to evolve with three types of synergies between the companies in this ecosystem: logistics infrastructure and services synergies, input–output synergies and industrial ecology synergies. We find that the spatial scale of the CE value chains in the port varies between segments and that they are generally less international than ‘linear’ value chains. The development of CE activities occupies a central place in PoA’s strategy, and PoA assumes new and active roles in advancing the circular business ecosystem, most notably through developing industrial ecology synergies and nurturing and attracting new, innovative CE companies. Finally, the circularity transition leads to changes in PoA’s business model, with an increasing focus on new services that create synergies, and a decreasing importance of the share of port dues in the total revenue mix.

Digitalization in Just-In-Time Approach as a Sustainable Solution for Maritime Logistics in the Baltic Sea Region

“…The transition to circular economy, for example, begins with the creation of an appropriate business model, which takes into account the interaction of various services and, for example, a decrease in the part of port cathedrals in the overall profit structure [59]. The smart port concept faces also the challenge of sustainable blue growth, which can be addressed by improving the efficiency of shipping and supply chain management, including port calls and planning cooperation with port and hinterland operators [60].…”

Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?

“…De Langen et al. 2020 ) or port ecosystem/cluster manager. The role of public entities and of international and domestic corporations in ports and the desired development path in port governance are again being revisited.…”

Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports?

“…Other valuable variables for each initiative are the location where the initiative takes place or is developed, which stakeholder took the initiative and who are the other partners involved (cf. role of actors in line with de Langen, Sornn-Friese and Hallworth [41]), when was the initiative started and what collaborative steps have been taken since the start, to more comprehensively understand the evolution of the involved actors. Together, these characteristics enable us to map port CE initiatives according to their strategic goal (for PAs, especially when they are initiating the CE project), location and territorial collaboration.…”