1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3356-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Plant and Soil Processes in Determining the Fate of Atmospheric Nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In upland ecosystems, inorganic inputs from wet and dry nitrogen deposition are likely to be significant in relation to the quantities of nitrogen cycling through the plant‐microbial‐soil system. As a result, atmospheric nitrogen deposition can alter the balance between soil microbial activity, the availability of nutrients such as phosphorus, soil acidity and carbon turnover (Williams & Anderson 1999). The underlying soil type will influence the way the nitrogen is cycled within the ecosystem, rates of nitrification and denitrification and any changes in litter decomposition and microbial activity (Yesmin et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In upland ecosystems, inorganic inputs from wet and dry nitrogen deposition are likely to be significant in relation to the quantities of nitrogen cycling through the plant‐microbial‐soil system. As a result, atmospheric nitrogen deposition can alter the balance between soil microbial activity, the availability of nutrients such as phosphorus, soil acidity and carbon turnover (Williams & Anderson 1999). The underlying soil type will influence the way the nitrogen is cycled within the ecosystem, rates of nitrification and denitrification and any changes in litter decomposition and microbial activity (Yesmin et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying soil type will influence the way the nitrogen is cycled within the ecosystem, rates of nitrification and denitrification and any changes in litter decomposition and microbial activity (Yesmin et al . 1996; Williams & Anderson 1999), all of which drive changes in the availability of nutrients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced NH 4 + -N production from litter increased its solubility however, and hence its mobility, so there were higher water-soluble NH 4 + -N concentrations at 0-5 cm except at week 31. Williams and Anderson (1999) also showed that NH 4 + -N was primarily produced in the litter horizons and potentially moved down to lower mineral soil layers. The watersoluble NH 4 + -N concentrations from the mixed litter treatment were higher at 5-25 cm during weeks 5, 11 and 31 which suggests combined effect of NH 4 + -N leaching from overlying horizons and insitu organic matter mineralization.…”
Section: Storage and Mobility Of Litter-derived Nhmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The NH 4 + produced was potentially mobile and raised NH 4 + concentrations in sub‐soils beneath the litter ameliorated layers at 15–20 and 20–25 cm depths, though the differences were not always significant. Williams & Anderson (1999) considered that NH 4 + production was concentrated in litter layers and then NH 4 + potentially migrated down to lower soil mineral layers. The net changes in drainage water NH 4 + concentration strongly suggest NH 4 + was retained within the system; however, an NH 4 + flush as a consequence of a freeze–thaw cycle was clearly observable during weeks 10 and 11 (Edwards & Cresser, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%