2019
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of personal relevance in the value creation process of edutainment consumption

Abstract: This paper explores the value creation process in an edutainment context. It attempts to capture the dual, differential value creation processes through two pathways, namely, affective and cognitive. Results revealed that affective and cognitive values not only increase customer satisfaction but also enhance consumer well‐being. Moreover, contrary to conventional belief asserting that value creation is a universal process, this study finds that those who had higher personal relevance with the edutainment conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these factors can disrupt the immersion process necessary for transportation. This finding is consistent with the literature that asserts how important the stability of the interaction environment is to a viewer’s emotional response and overall evaluation (Chan, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these factors can disrupt the immersion process necessary for transportation. This finding is consistent with the literature that asserts how important the stability of the interaction environment is to a viewer’s emotional response and overall evaluation (Chan, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Findings from the research aim to make contribution to a body ‘of research [that is] often focused on the impact of edutainment on communication, persuasion, and learning outcomes (Haytko, 2006; Kurthakoti et al, 2013; Singhal and Rogers, 2002)’. (Chan, 2019: 200). Published research using transportation dimensions typically uses less complex presentation structures, or more traditional unimodal narrative text(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the model fit indices indicate an acceptable model fit (CFI = .99, NFI = .98, GFI = .97, RMSEA = .08, SRMR = .02, with χ 2 [4] = 18.102, p = .001). While a significant p ‐value may suggest a poor fit, the ratio between χ 2 and the number of degrees of freedom is less than the cut‐off of 5 (4.5) (Chan, 2019).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample was of 137 (59.9% female, M age = 30.02). In line with Chan (), sample demographic characteristics and results for testing differences between awe and neutral conditions from Study 1 to Study 3 are listed in detail (Table ). The samples recruited were randomly assigned to each of two conditions in all the three studies, and there are no significant differences in sample characteristics between awe and neutral conditions (except for significant gender differences in Study 3 and the results does not change if we include gender as a covariate).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%