1967
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0601:tropii>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Particle Interactions in the Distribution of Electricity in Thunderstorms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of charges and electric fields increases the probability of coalescence following collision to the point where small charges and small fields cause almost 100% coalescence. In the presence of electric fields, or when the drops are charged, observations by Gunn (1965aGunn ( , 1965b and Sartor (1967) show that by controlling their relative velocity, they can be made to coalesce, with subsequent disruption and thus production of raindrops. Further, Sartor (1967) showed that even a small percentage of cloud and precipitation drops bouncing or disrupting in an electric field can be significant in the problems of cloud electrification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of charges and electric fields increases the probability of coalescence following collision to the point where small charges and small fields cause almost 100% coalescence. In the presence of electric fields, or when the drops are charged, observations by Gunn (1965aGunn ( , 1965b and Sartor (1967) show that by controlling their relative velocity, they can be made to coalesce, with subsequent disruption and thus production of raindrops. Further, Sartor (1967) showed that even a small percentage of cloud and precipitation drops bouncing or disrupting in an electric field can be significant in the problems of cloud electrification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as shown in Fig. 1(c), the constant 1/2 in the first term (I) of equation (5) is due to lack of collisions involving smaller particles which are upstream of the larger particles (Sartor, 1967). Fig.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In water (spark discharge between colliding water drops in an electric field), it is of the order of 10 -9 S [Sartor, 1967].…”
Section: From Buser's [1976] Work It Should Be 10 -7 S or Less In Icementioning
confidence: 99%