2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0693-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of overt language production in the Hebb repetition effect

Abstract: The Hebb repetition effect (Hebb, 1961) occurs when recall performance improves for a list that is repeated during a serial-recall task. This effect is considered a good experimental analogue to language learning. Our objective was to evaluate the role of overt language production in language learning by manipulating recall direction during a Hebb repetition paradigm. In each trial, seven nonsense syllables were presented auditorily. Participants had to orally recall the items either in the presentation order … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reveal the contribution of production processes, it would be necessary to first allow the development of strong associations between perceptual and production processes before switching recall direction. If production processes are indeed not involved in the learning of the repeated list, the switch in recall direction should be done at no cost, as found previously by Guerrette et al (2017). Contrarily, if production processes do contribute to the learning of the repeated list, given the development of stronger association between perceptual and production processes, recall performance of the repeated list should be affected by the switch in recall direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To reveal the contribution of production processes, it would be necessary to first allow the development of strong associations between perceptual and production processes before switching recall direction. If production processes are indeed not involved in the learning of the repeated list, the switch in recall direction should be done at no cost, as found previously by Guerrette et al (2017). Contrarily, if production processes do contribute to the learning of the repeated list, given the development of stronger association between perceptual and production processes, recall performance of the repeated list should be affected by the switch in recall direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This finding is in line with previous studies. In effect, although it is generally believed that recall performance is superior in forward than in backward recall, many studies showed no difference between both recall directions (e.g., Anderson, Bothell, Lebiere, & Matessa, 1998;Beaudry, Saint-Aubin, Guérard, & Pâquet, 2018;Bireta et al, 2010, Experiments 1-2;Farrand & Jones, 1996;Guérard, Saint-Aubin, Burns, & Chamberland, 2012;Guerrette et al, 2017;Li & Lewandowsky, 1995, Experiments 1-2;Madigan, 1971;Thomas, Milner, & Haberlandt, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations