2023
DOI: 10.1177/17454999231158042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of overeducation and horizontal mismatch for gender inequalities in labor income of higher education graduates in Europe

Abstract: Evidence on gender inequality in the labor market is extensive. However, little is known about the potential role of overeducation and horizontal mismatch in explaining women’s labor-market disadvantages. We draw on recent data from the Eurograduate pilot survey to investigate the role of overeducation, field-of-study mismatch and field-specific overskilling for gender gaps in labor income in the European landscape. We found considerable variations in the extent of both gender earning gaps (GEGs) and wage gaps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relaxing the homogeneity assumption allows us to investigate whether women's opportunities in a post-industrial economy mean that all women are better off than before or whether certain categories of women have benefited more than others (Mulè 2023). The scant literature on "within-women" inequality often differentiates women according to educational attainment, income level, or occupation (Korpi et al 2013;McCall 2000;Hook and Li 2020;Sauer et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxing the homogeneity assumption allows us to investigate whether women's opportunities in a post-industrial economy mean that all women are better off than before or whether certain categories of women have benefited more than others (Mulè 2023). The scant literature on "within-women" inequality often differentiates women according to educational attainment, income level, or occupation (Korpi et al 2013;McCall 2000;Hook and Li 2020;Sauer et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%