2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Osteobiologics in Spinal Deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone graft substitutes are commonly used to extend the volume of available autogenous bone harvested in major reconstructive spine procedures ( 7 , 15 ). While ceramic-based osteoconductive scaffolds account for a majority of the synthetic bone substitute materials, it is unclear whether inorganic mineral is essential for – or contributes favorably to – bone formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone graft substitutes are commonly used to extend the volume of available autogenous bone harvested in major reconstructive spine procedures ( 7 , 15 ). While ceramic-based osteoconductive scaffolds account for a majority of the synthetic bone substitute materials, it is unclear whether inorganic mineral is essential for – or contributes favorably to – bone formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of the immune response that occurs depends on the degree of enzymatic degradation of the native allograft protein. Human allograft is available in two forms: mineralised and demineralised [17][18][19]. Among the mineralised allograft, freeze-dried allograft is processed by removing water by a vacuum process and is less immunogenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, allograft with or without demineralised bone matrix (DBM) have been recently used for ACDF and have achieved satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes [15,16]. However, allograft and DBM also have several disadvantages, such as risk of disease transmission and immune reaction [17][18][19]. Moreover, the incidence of postoperative infection after ACDF is reported to be higher in allograft compared to that of autograft [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%