2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Organizational Factors in the Provision of Comprehensive Women's Health in the Veterans Health Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Reddy et al. ) may impact women Veterans' experience and thereby the rate of uptake of VA gender‐specific benefits such as maternity coverage. External social and policy factors likely also affect the generalizability of our single‐state study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Reddy et al. ) may impact women Veterans' experience and thereby the rate of uptake of VA gender‐specific benefits such as maternity coverage. External social and policy factors likely also affect the generalizability of our single‐state study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, California's Veterans' care patterns and needs may not be generalizable to other states. Internal factors, such as regional and local variation in the degree to which VA facilities have implemented gender-specific Veteran care (Oishi et al 2011;Reddy et al 2016) may impact women Veterans' experience and thereby the rate of uptake of VA gender-specific benefits such as maternity coverage. External social and policy factors likely also affect the generalizability of our single-state study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Years 2 and 3, we will re-administer the same surveys, adapting selected domains in relation to EBQI targets of participating VAs. We will include measures of leadership support (22), local resources (e.g., sufficiency of time, personnel, equipment) (23), practice structure (e.g., women's health care model, staff mix, referral arrangements), service availability (24), care coordination arrangements (within and outside VA), ability to engage in QI (e.g., barriers to QI, data access by gender), gender-sensitivity of environment (e.g., privacy), local challenges (e.g., provider shortages, hiring difficulties, practice chaos) (25,26), facility type (e.g., size, academic affiliation, urban/rural), and EBQI activities (17). We will field surveys through REDCap, a VA-approved web survey vendor.…”
Section: Data Sources and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight manuscripts addressed delivery of reproductive healthcare, including three qualitative studies (Supplementary Table 7). [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] Manuscripts addressed reproductive health program development and needs assessment and determinants of reproductive health services, policies, and programs within VA. Five manuscripts addressed program development for improving and integrating reproductive healthcare within VA. [66][67][68][69][70] These included successful development of a women's health training program for resident physicians 66 and identification of key challenges for coordination of gynecology-oncology. 68 In terms of reproductive healthcare needs from the patient perspective, findings highlighted the impact of past trauma on care, the need for additional peer and provider support, 67 knowledge gaps regarding VA coverage of reproductive health services, the desire for additional coverage of infertility and newborn care, and experiences with gender discrimination.…”
Section: Menopausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 Three manuscripts examined determinants of reproductive healthcare in VA. Factors associated with increased availability of reproductive healthcare services in primary care and the emergency department included having a women's health clinic (aOR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.12-9.24), being a metropolitan hospital-based clinic (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.74), and having gynecologists on staff (gynecology consultation for emergency department aOR, 10.9; 95% CI, 3.2-36.6). [71][72][73]…”
Section: Menopausementioning
confidence: 99%